Cosmos/Moon/Moon Landing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Editing Cosmos/Moon/Moon Landing |
added No tracks behind the moon rover |
||
Line 25:
[[File:No Moon Lander impact marks.png|180px|right]]
Have you ever seen the photos of the astronauts footprints embedded in moon dust? The astronauts described this dust as being similar to “talcum powder or wet sand”. That being the case, why is there no sign of impact where the lunar module landed? You’d think that a rocket-ship landing on a big pile of talcum powder would leave some kind of impression in the surface, but according to the moon landing photos, no such evidence exists. In fact, it looks more like the lunar module was just placed in position. This is just yet another blindingly obvious defect in the details of the moon landing hoax.
====No tracks behind the moon rover====
[[File:USAMoonNoTracks-ButChinaFiguredItOut.png|right|200px]]
It seems the moon rover doesn't leave tire tracks like the walking left foot prints. There are some pictures that show tire tracks while others look as if the lander was literally dropped into position by a crane. China seems to have caught on and made their images have tire tracks. But, what can you say? It was 1969 when the USA faked it. There are so many discrepancies, that if it were one or two, then perhaps we could wave it off. But, fanboys will continue to make excused for the 50 million dollar military complex [[NASA]] until the cows come home, so I'm sure every single discrepancy has some sort of excuse out there. They certainly have flooded the internet with fact checkers stating the moon landing was real, which is funny, last time I checked, every single fact-checker was later discovered a fraud.
===Gallery===
| |||