Cosmos/Moon/What is the Moon: Difference between revisions
added some text for the projected moon & moon map theories
(added some text for the projected moon & moon map theories) |
|||
Line 20:
We do not believe NASA's moon landing was real. Not only does NASA's story conflict with our limited understanding of what the moon is, these so call missions are full of discrepancies or perhaps intentional lies. It is clear the moon landing was a staged hoax, filmed on a studio set. The moon landing was questioned since the original airing of the moon landing mission, and modernly it has become sort of a joke to actually believe the moon landings were real, it seems People aren't as gullible about technology and movie "magic" as they were in the 60's.
The Sun’s light is golden, warm, drying, preservative and antiseptic, while the Moon’s light is silver, cool, damp, putrefying and septic. The Sun’s rays decrease the combustion of a bonfire, while the Moon’s rays increase combustion. Plant and animal substances exposed to sunlight quickly dry, shrink, coagulate, and lose the tendency to decompose and putrify; grapes and other fruits become solid, partially candied and preserved like raisins, dates, and prunes; animal flesh coagulates, loses its volatile gaseous constituents, becomes firm, dry, and slow to decay. When exposed to moonlight, however, plant and animal substances tend to show symptoms of putrefaction and decay.
====An opaque, sphere like moon====▼
In direct sunlight a thermometer will read higher than another thermometer placed in the shade, but in full, direct moonlight a thermometer will read lower than another placed in the shade. If the Sun’s light is collected in a large lens and thrown to a focus point it can create significant heat, while the Moon’s light collected similarly creates no heat. In the "Lancet Medical Journal,” from March 14th, 1856, particulars are given of several experiments which proved the Moon's rays when concentrated can actually reduce the temperature upon a thermometer more than eight degrees.
So sunlight and moonlight clearly have altogether different properties, and furthermore the Moon itself cannot physically be both a spherical body and a reflector of the Sun’s light! Reflectors must be flat or concave for light rays to have any angle of incidence; If a reflector’s surface is convex then every ray of light points in a direct line with the radius perpendicular to the surface resulting in no reflection.
Many witnesses have said that, on a clear night, during a waxing or waning cycle; it is even possible to occasionally see stars and planets directly through the surface of the Moon!
-Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny”
<blockquote>
“If the moon lifted up the water, it is evident that near the land, the water would be drawn away and low instead of high tide caused. Again, the velocity and path of the moon are uniform, and it follows that if she exerted any influence on the earth, that influence could only be a uniform influence. But the tides are not uniform. At Port Natal the rise and fall is about 6 feet, while at Beira, about 600 miles up the coast, the rise and fall is 26 feet. This effectually settles the matter that the moon has no influence on the tides. Tides are caused by the gentle and gradual rise and fall of the earth on the bosom of the mighty deep. In inland lakes, there are no tides; which also proves that the moon cannot attract either the earth or water to cause tides. But the fact that the basin of the lake is on the earth which rests on the waters of the deep shows that no tides are possible, as the waters of the lakes together with the earth rise and fall, and thus the tides at the coast are caused; while there are no tides on waters unconnected with the sea.”
</blockquote>
“Even Sir Isaac Newton himself confessed that the explanation of the Moon's action on the Tides was the least satisfactory part of his theory of Gravitation. This theory asserts that the larger object attracts the smaller, and the mass of the Moon being reckoned as only one-eighth of that of the Earth, it follows that, if, by the presumed force of Gravitation, the Earth revolves round the Sun, much more, for the same reason, should the Moon do so likewise, instead of which that willful orb still continues to go round our world. Tides vary greatly in height, owing chiefly to the different configurations of the adjoining lands. At Chepstow it rises to 60 feet, at Portishead to 50, while at Dublin Bay it is but 12, and at Wexford only 5 feet … That the Earth itself has a slight tremulous motion may be seen in the movement of the spirit-level, even when fixed as steadily as possible, and that the sea has a fluctuation may be witnessed by the oscillation of an anchored ship in the calmest day of summer. By what means the tides are so regularly affected is at present only conjectured; possibly it may be by atmospheric pressure on the waters of the Great Deep, and perhaps even the Moon itself, as suggested by the late Dr. Rowbotham, may influence the atmosphere, increasing or diminishing its barometric pressure, and indirectly the rise and fall of the Earth in the waters.” -David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (259-260)
-Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Earth Not a Globe, 2nd Edition” (108-110)
<blockquote>
“Bearing this fact in mind, that there exists a continual pressure of the atmosphere upon the Earth, and associating it with the fact that the Earth is a vast plane ‘stretched out upon the waters,’ and it will be seen that it must of necessity slightly fluctuate, or slowly rise and fall in the water. As by the action of the atmosphere the Earth is slowly depressed, the water moves towards the receding shore and produces the flood tide; and when by the reaction of the resisting oceanic medium the Earth gradually ascends the waters recede, and the ebb tide is produced. This is the general cause of tides. Whatever peculiarities are observable they may be traced to the reaction of channels, bays, headlands, and other local causes … That the Earth has a vibratory or tremulous motion, such as must necessarily belong to a floating and fluctuating structure, is abundantly proved by the experience of astronomers and surveyors. If a delicate spirit-level be firmly placed upon a rock or upon the most solid foundation which it is possible to construct, the very curious phenomenon will be observed of constant change in the position of the air-bubble. However carefully the ‘level’ may be adjusted, and the instrument protected from the atmosphere, the ‘bubble’ will not maintain its position many seconds together. A somewhat similar influence has been noticed in astronomical observatories, where instruments of the best construction and placed in the most approved positions cannot always be relied upon without occasional re-adjustment.”
</blockquote>
▲====An opaque, sphere like moon theory====
An ardent FE supporter, and an ex-member of an astronomical society applied knowledge based on her personal observation with a telescope said:
<blockquote>
Line 30 ⟶ 50:
</blockquote>
====A transparent, disc moon theory====
[[File:Star in Moon.png|250px|right]]
Some say the moon is transparent. On a clear night, during a waxing or waning cycle, it is even possible to occasionally see stars and planets directly through the surface of the Moon!
Line 54 ⟶ 74:
A Star occulting a crescent Moon has long been a popular symbol of Islam, was the symbol of the Ottoman Empire, it is found on the flags of Algeria, Azerbaijan, Libya, Malaysia, Mauritania, Pakistan, Singapore, Tunisia, Turkey, and in the Coat of Arms of countries from Croatia, to Germany, Ireland, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Sweden, Ukraine and the United Kingdom. Its origins can be traced back thousands of years to ancient Hindu culture where it is found in the symbol for the word “Om,” the primary name for the almighty, representing the union of god Shiva and goddess Shakti. Why the symbol has carried such widespread historical significance is open to interpretation, but regardless of interpretation, the image of star(s) occulting the Moon has long been a prevalent and meaningful picture.
====The moon is plazma theory====
[[File:1965ScientistStatingMoonIsPlasma.png|left|220px|link=|]]
In a 1965 video interview, Professor Foster explains that the moon is plasma. <ref name=1965Plasma></ref>
Line 68 ⟶ 88:
</blockquote>
====The projected moon theory====
There are many who theorize the sun, moon, and the stars are a "projection" that originate from the North pole region, in some sort of energy vortex or describe this area as the "tree of life".
[Need citation and further information on this topic]
====The moon map theory====▼
[[File:Moon map.webp|right|150px|The Moon map of earth]]
There are many who theorize the moon is a "reflection" or a sort of a photograph of earth. Their method to this theory or observation requires some photo manipulation, including mirroring a picture of the moon and working with the contrast to amplify regions of the moon to make it appear as a map with continents. When lining up the continents to earths continents on a flat earth map, only about 25% of the moons surface matches, and some of the land masses seen on the moon map represent continents that sunk, such as Atlantis. It is theorized that the rest of the patches on the moon surface image represent land masses beyond the antarctic ice circle.
[Need citation and further information on this topic]
▲====The moon map====
| |||