FAQ/Satellites: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<languages />
<translate>
== What are Satellites? ==
[[File:
===What is a Satellite?===
Flip on your TV, you might get unlucky enough to witness [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] or Google sending another "Satellite" into "Space".<br>▼
Accoring to the wikipedia, A "satellite" or "artificial satellite" is an object, placed into orbit around a celestial body (up in the sky). Satellites have a variety of uses, including communication relay, weather forecasting, navigation (GPS), broadcasting, scientific research, and Earth observation. Additional military uses are reconnaissance, early warning, signals intelligence and, potentially, weapon delivery.
===Satellites in "space"?===
▲Flip on your TV, you might get unlucky enough to witness [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] or Google
<big>10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1 - LIFTOFF!</big>
Line 8 ⟶ 14:
* Forget that services haven't actually improved in decades.
* Forget that they complain about the fossil fuels cause greenhouse effects and fact they use thousands of times more fuel to send up a rocket (that later dumps into the ocean)
====The problem is, IT'S ALL FAKE!====
[[File:Balloon-clipart-free-clip-art-images-115x170.jpg|80px|right]]
Satellites are BALLOONS! Yes, a tin can floating with a balloon (like what you give to your kid for their birthday only much much bigger (football stadium size) and costing us millions and millions of dollars).
===
[[File:ISS_over_flat_earth.gif|thumb|ISS Path over flat earth & globe]]
Satellites require an ECEF (Earth Centered Earth Fixed) Coordinate system, have to then impose an ECI (Earth Centered Inertial) frame for theoretical relativistic correction, and account for REAL inertial forces rotating around a geostatic position (Centrifugal, Coriolis, and Euler forces) as if “space” moves around a stationary earth. The orbital paths would be ellipses over a plane, a simple coordinate transform to spherical coordinates and you would never know the difference.
If satellites launched by NASA and other space agencies were proof of anything, it would prove geocentricity and explicitly refute heliocentrism. In fact, the satellites have to account for a change in velocity relative to the center of the ECI and have to correct for anisotropic signal propagation (variant speed of light with a preferred direction), both of which explicitly falsify Relativity. Without Relativity, Michelson-Morley (and subsequent replication with superior precision) proves the earth does not move through space. Long story short, the physics and equations applied for these satellites would quite literally prove the earth to be at rest.
GPS keeps times in a local reference frame via a range measurement equation. Kinematically, both of these frames are equivalent to being stationary. They're both synced to that ECI reference frame, so these measurements are going to be done in that frame. And then the ECEF reference frame is also synced to the same time. With that, they should have a really accurate way to measure distance down to the millimeter. <ref name=KinematicsvsDynamics></ref>
According to Mathematical Covariance and the assumed speed of C, having a fixed speed they should be able to take that distance and put it on any coordinate system based on the same time and have accurate distances for everything. A Very early adaption of the varying speed of the light, but disguised as an effect of rotation on a system.
The sagnac correction is not to account for anything in a revolving system, but to account for the C+V variant speed of light covered up by the ECI reference frame being synced with sidereal time. <ref name=SatelliteCoordinateSystem></ref>
=== This is NOT a Satellite ===
Line 23 ⟶ 37:
SpaceSatelliteCGI.jpg|A CGI "Satellite" in "Space"
SatelliteCGIRelease.jpg|A CGI "Satellite" being released from a CGI rocket in "Space"
</gallery>▼
=== This is what Satellites really are ===▼
Satellites are actually devices hung on huge football stadium sized helium balloons and released. <ref name=AllBalloons></ref>▼
<gallery>▼
NASAballoon.jpg|a NASA balloon"Satellite"▼
NASAballoonLaunch.jpg|a NASA balloon "Satellite" launch▼
NASAballoonCrash.jpg|a NASA balloon "Satellite" crash▼
GoogleBalloonCrash.jpg|Google balloon "Satellite" crash▼
AstroNOT working on a satellite.jpg|AstroNOT working on a satellite▼
Pennywise.jpg|More accurate than what NASA told us about satellites ▼
</gallery>
Line 54 ⟶ 57:
The increase in satellite traffic has also caused concern about the increased risk of collisions, both from active satellites and from defective satellites that can no longer maneuver to avoid collisions. [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] wrote to the FCC on October 29, 2020, to express concern that the increase in large constellation proposals to the FCC could cause a significant increase in the frequency of conjuncture events. (Too many balloons oh my!)
===What about the Himawari?===
The Himawari is said to be a geostationary satellite, operated by the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA). It's purpose is to support weather forecasting, tropical cyclone tracking, and meteorology research.
There are many who believe the Himawari provides live video of the "globe" earth, however the images have been proven to be stitched and curve faked using the blue marble data set, which utilizes a flat map and mapped onto a sphere shape. <ref name=Himawari></ref>
===Full of gas===
According to NPR, "The World Is Constantly Running Out Of Helium", <ref name=nprhelium></ref> however [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] consumes the most helium for their satellites and other scientific trickery; each hung on helium balloons the size of football stadiums). One of [[Agencies/NASA|NASA's]] current helium contracts (starting Oct. 1 2023, for two-years) costs taxpayers approximately $149 million. NASA requires helium to support the International Space Station Program (to hang tin cans on balloons) as well as the Orion Programs that support Artemis (satalloons). <ref name=nasahelium></ref>
▲=== This is what Satellites really are ===
▲Satellites are actually devices hung on huge football stadium sized helium balloons and released. <ref name=AllBalloons></ref>
▲<gallery>
▲NASAballoon.jpg|a NASA balloon"Satellite"
▲NASAballoonLaunch.jpg|a NASA balloon "Satellite" launch
▲NASAballoonCrash.jpg|a NASA balloon "Satellite" crash
▲GoogleBalloonCrash.jpg|Google balloon "Satellite" crash
▲AstroNOT working on a satellite.jpg|AstroNOT working on a satellite
▲Pennywise.jpg|More accurate than what NASA told us about satellites
▲</gallery>
=== See Also ===
* See document of Balloons used for satellites in the Corona Program, Space and Missile Systems Center Los Angeles, CA. Air Force Base <ref name=Corona></ref>
* See document "10 meter Sub-Orbital Large Balloon Reflector (LBR) - May 2014" <ref name=LBR></ref>
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvP5VK96KTk YouTube: Satellite crashes in Brazil]
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKGaDCA9yyc YouTube: NASA Launches Super-Pressure Balloon]
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjP3wV7bEoM YouTube: Space satellite falls into backyard in Saginaw County]
===References===
Line 71 ⟶ 93:
<ref name="nprhelium">[https://www.npr.org/2019/11/01/775554343/the-world-is-constantly-running-out-of-helium-heres-why-it-matters NPR.org: The World Is Constantly Running Out Of Helium]</ref>
<ref name="nasahelium">[https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-awards-contract-for-acquisition-of-gaseous-liquid-helium/ NASA.gov: NASA Awards Contract for Acquisition of Gaseous, Liquid Helium]</ref>
<ref name="Himawari">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfY1tbP_wXs&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2F&feature=emb_logo YouTube: FAKING SPACE - Himawari Hoax]</ref>
<ref name="SatelliteCoordinateSystem">[https://publish.obsidian.md/shanesql/GPS publish.obsidian.md: Shane's GPS Satellite Database]</ref>
<ref name="KinematicsvsDynamics">[https://publish.obsidian.md/shanesql/Kinematics+vs+Dynamics publish.obsidian.md: Shane's Kinematics vs Dynamics]</ref>
</references>
</translate>
|