Cosmos/Moon/Moon Landing: Difference between revisions

From True Earth wiki
< Cosmos‎ | Moon
Content added Content deleted
VisualWikitext
(add Description Tag)
(28 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== The Moon Landing Hoax(es) ==
{{#description2:True Earth/Flat Earth/Moon/Moon Landing Hoax}}
<languages />
<translate>
== The Moon Landing Hoax == <!--T:1-->


<!--T:2-->
===Evidence the moon landing was a hoax===
===Evidence the moon landing was a hoax===
[[File:WavyMoonFlag.gif|right]]
[[File:WavyMoonFlag.gif|right]]
Just looking at the Apollo Moon LOLander or looking at the faces of the Men who supposedly set foot on the moon, you could easily begin to question the reality of the moon missions. If that was the only evidence, then it could easily be dismissed. However, the further you look into it the more issues you'll find, such as [[NASA]] admitted they destroyed the technology that got them to the moon and they also lost the original footage of the moon landing missions. Welp, there goes any solid evidence the multi-billion dollar missions were legit - Game over! Fortunately there's hundreds of photos and subsequent [[NASA]] screw-ups that can help us decide.
Just looking at the Apollo Moon LOLander or looking at the faces of the Men who supposedly set foot on the moon, you could easily begin to question the reality of the moon missions. If that was the only evidence, then it could easily be dismissed. However, the further you look into it the more issues you'll find, such as [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] admitted they destroyed the technology that got them to the moon and they also lost the original footage of the moon landing missions. Welp, there goes any solid evidence the multi-billion dollar missions were legit - Game over! Fortunately there's hundreds of photos and subsequent [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] screw-ups that can help us decide.


<!--T:3-->
====The American Flag Flutters Gently in the Non Existent Breeze====
====The American Flag Flutters Gently in the Non Existent Breeze====
It’s an iconic image for the citizens of the United States of America: their flag, planted on the moon and waving gently in the breeze. Only, there is no breeze on the moon, meaning there is no air in the moon’s atmosphere, and hence, there is no wind whatsoever.
It’s an iconic image for the citizens of the United States of America: their flag, planted on the moon and waving gently in the breeze. Only, there is no breeze on the moon, meaning there is no air in the moon’s atmosphere, and hence, there is no wind whatsoever.


<!--T:4-->
====Is There More Than One Sun? Because Those Shadows Don’t Match Up!====
====Is There More Than One Sun? Because Those Shadows Don’t Match Up!====
[[File:MoonShadows.png|200px|right]]
[[File:MoonShadows.png|200px|right]]
[[NASA]] produced an abundant supply of photos and video footage to support their moon landing. But, it soon became evident that there was something a bit fishy about these photos on the moon; ever noticed that the angle of the shadows do not match up? Shadows are caused by light sources. On the moon, there should only be one light source: the Sun. So, logically, all shadows should be parallel to each other. Only shadows in the photos of moon landing are not. In fact, the shadows in many of the photos run in different directions. It’s almost as if the shadows are caused by… yes, multiple lights on a film set!
[[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] produced an abundant supply of photos and video footage to support their moon landing. But, it soon became evident that there was something a bit fishy about these photos on the moon; ever noticed that the angle of the shadows do not match up? Shadows are caused by light sources. On the moon, there should only be one light source: the Sun. So, logically, all shadows should be parallel to each other. Only shadows in the photos of moon landing are not. In fact, the shadows in many of the photos run in different directions. It’s almost as if the shadows are caused by… yes, multiple lights on a film set!


<!--T:5-->
====You’re in Space… Then Where Are the Stars?====
====You’re in Space… Then Where Are the Stars?====
On a cloudless evening, you can see an abundance of twinkling stars in the night sky. Surely from the moon, with its lack of clouds and complete absence of artificial light, you should be able to see even more stars with the naked eye? Only, you can’t. In fact, in all of the photos taken during moon landing, you cannot see a single star. Not one. Sure, the photos taken in the 60’s weren’t amazing quality, but these days you can capture the stars in a photo taken from your phone, so shouldn’t the high tech [[NASA]] cameras have been able to pick up something?
On a cloudless evening, you can see an abundance of twinkling stars in the night sky. Surely from the moon, with its lack of clouds and complete absence of artificial light, you should be able to see even more stars with the naked eye? Only, you can’t. In fact, in all of the photos taken during moon landing, you cannot see a single star. Not one. Sure, the photos taken in the 60’s weren’t amazing quality, but these days you can capture the stars in a photo taken from your phone, so shouldn’t the high tech [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] cameras have been able to pick up something?


<!--T:6-->
====Carved by Nature… Why Does That Rock Have a "C" Drawn on It?====
====Carved by Nature… Why Does That Rock Have a "C" Drawn on It?====
[[File:Moon rock C.png|200px|right]]
[[File:Moon rock C.png|200px|right]]
In yet another example of the technicians on set just being sloppy, one of the moon landing photos shows a “moon rock” which has a perfect letter ‘C’ printed on it. The perfect symmetry of the letter shows that it is not naturally occurring. Now, it’s perfectly credible that a prop used on a film set would be marked with a reference letter. But there is no plausible argument for the “C” just being naturally weathered into the surface of the rock. As a result, [[NASA]] came up with a different, though no less implausible, explanation for the rock with the “C”. According to them, it’s a stray hair. It can’t be more ridiculous than this!
In yet another example of the technicians on set just being sloppy, one of the moon landing photos shows a “moon rock” which has a perfect letter ‘C’ printed on it. The perfect symmetry of the letter shows that it is not naturally occurring. Now, it’s perfectly credible that a prop used on a film set would be marked with a reference letter. But there is no plausible argument for the “C” just being naturally weathered into the surface of the rock. As a result, [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] came up with a different, though no less implausible, explanation for the rock with the “C”. According to them, it’s a stray hair. It can’t be more ridiculous than this!


<!--T:7-->
====Fly Through a Belt of Radiation and You Should've Get Cooked====
====Fly Through a Belt of Radiation and You Should've Get Cooked====
Everyone knows how dangerous radiation can be: overexposure to it can cause radiation poisoning and even death, so It is should be avoided at all costs. To get to the moon, you have to fly through a band a radiation known as the Van Allen radiation belt. Yes, the space craft had an aluminum coating, but is that really enough to protect a human being whilst they spend over one and a half hours traversing a band of radiation? [[NASA]], of course, said “yes” and that the astronauts weren’t in the radiation for all that long. But an hour and a half still sounds like a pretty long time to be inside a cosmic microwave.
Everyone knows how dangerous radiation can be: overexposure to it can cause radiation poisoning and even death, so It is should be avoided at all costs. To get to the moon, you have to fly through a band a radiation known as the Van Allen radiation belt. Yes, the space craft had an aluminum coating, but is that really enough to protect a human being whilst they spend over one and a half hours traversing a band of radiation? [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]], of course, said “yes” and that the astronauts weren’t in the radiation for all that long. But an hour and a half still sounds like a pretty long time to be inside a cosmic microwave.


<!--T:8-->
====No Impact or thruster marks====
====No Impact or thruster marks====
[[File:No Moon Lander impact marks.png|180px|right]]
[[File:No Moon Lander impact marks.png|180px|right]]
Have you ever seen the photos of the astronauts footprints embedded in moon dust? The astronauts described this dust as being similar to “talcum powder or wet sand”. That being the case, why is there no sign of impact where the lunar module landed? You’d think that a rocket-ship landing on a big pile of talcum powder would leave some kind of impression in the surface, but according to the moon landing photos, no such evidence exists. In fact, it looks more like the lunar module was just placed in position. This is just yet another blindingly obvious defect in the details of the moon landing hoax.
Have you ever seen the photos of the astronauts footprints embedded in moon dust? The astronauts described this dust as being similar to “talcum powder or wet sand”. That being the case, why is there no sign of impact where the lunar module landed? You’d think that a rocket-ship landing on a big pile of talcum powder would leave some kind of impression in the surface, but according to the moon landing photos, no such evidence exists. In fact, it looks more like the lunar module was just placed in position. This is just yet another blindingly obvious defect in the details of the moon landing hoax.


<!--T:9-->
====No tracks behind the moon rover====
====No tracks behind the moon rover====
[[File:USAMoonNoTracks-ButChinaFiguredItOut.png|right|200px]]
[[File:USAMoonNoTracks-ButChinaFiguredItOut.png|right|200px]]
It seems the moon rover doesn't leave tire tracks like the walking left foot prints. There are some pictures that show tire tracks while others look as if the lander was literally dropped into position by a crane. China seems to have caught on and made their images have tire tracks. But, what can you say? It was 1969 when the USA faked it.
It seems the moon rover doesn't leave tire tracks like the walking left foot prints. There are some pictures that show tire tracks while others look as if the lander was literally dropped into position by a crane. China seems to have caught on and made their images have tire tracks. But, what can you say? It was 1969 when the USA faked it.


<!--T:10-->
===Timeline of "successful" Lunar Lander "missions"===
====Even AI thinks NASA's moon-landings are fake====
Google AI's analysis says US Moon landing images are fake, in an article on November 27, 2023.

<!--T:11-->
The analysis of some of the photos and images of the U.S. astronauts landing on the Moon using neural networks showed they are fake, Vladimir Putin was told at an “Artificial Intelligence World Tour" in Moscow, and the Russian President found it "very interesting".

<!--T:12-->
The video of the analysis result and conversation of the Russian President with the Data Research Department of Sberbank, Nikolai Gerasimhen, at the Moscow AI event is now viral.
“Meanwhile it (the AI analysis) raises no particular questions about this photo taken by a Chinese lunar rover”, Putin is told.

<!--T:13-->
China's unmanned lunar mission named Chang’e is a series of lunar probes launched by the China National Space Administration starting with the launch of Chang’e 1 in October 2007.

<!--T:14-->
<blockquote>
“It believes this one is fake?”
</blockquote>
“It believes this one is fake?” Putin is seen in the video first touching the wing of his nose and then asking after a brief pause while pointing at the Apollo 11 images displayed on a screen.

<!--T:15-->
“Yes. Look this is red", Putin was told.

<!--T:16-->
Sberbank President German Gref who is seen accompanying Putin in the video then said, "This is what Google’s neural network thinks, not our analysis. So there will be no bias." <ref name=AIfakeMoon></ref>


<!--T:17-->
===Images from the moon surface - before they got back with the film===
A few examples of images from the moon, before Apollo returned with the film. Check the table below for the Apollo 11 timeline.

<!--T:18-->
<gallery>
Apollo11_-_666s.jpg|Nixon giving the boys the ol' 666 symbol.
Apollo-11-penis_mission_gettyimages-517427552.webp|NASA had "SEX" written in the clouds, but here's the penis shaped lunar mission.

<!--T:19-->
Nixon-apollo-call-meme-4044257547.jpg|Nixon talking to the moon lander with a picture from the moon surface
WashingtonPost 1969-07-21 c39ba5e68a57c5b337d358869b8c1b12.png|July 21 1969-Washington Post showing images from the moon before Apollo 11 returned with the film.
SF chronicle July 21 1969 2480x2480.jpg|July 21 1969-SF Chronicle showing images from the moon before Apollo 11 returned with the film.
Canada Life 1969-07-21 6ed1bc77995aa2301474ba2f085a13be.jpg|July 21 1969-Canada Life showing images from the moon before Apollo 11 returned with the film.

<!--T:20-->
</gallery>

<!--T:21-->
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Apollo 11 mission timeline
|+ "if you believe, they put a man on the moon"
|-
|-
! Craft !! Agency !! Date !! Description
! Date !! Event
|-
|-
| July 16, 1969 13:32:00 UTC || Scheduled July 16th blastoff of Apollo 11
| Luna 9 || Lavochkin || January 31 1966 || First spacecraft to land successfully on the Moon. Touchdown on 3 February 1966 at 18:45:30 UTC. Returned data until 6 February at 22:55 UTC.
|-
|-
| July 16, 1969 || One Loop Around Earth, Then Moon-Bound (part of the the penis shaped lunar mission)
| Surveyor 1 || NASA || May 30 1966 || Landed in Oceanus Procellarum on 2 June 1966 at 06:17:36 UTC. Returned data until loss of power on 13 July.
|-
|-
| July 19, 1969 || After traveling 240,000 miles in 76 hours, Apollo 11 entered into a lunar orbit
| Luna 13 || Lavochkin || December 21 1966 || Successfully landed in Oceanus Procellarum at 18:01 UTC on 24 December 1966. Returned images from the surface and studied the lunar soil. Operated until depletion of power at 06:31 UTC on 28 December.
|-
|-
| July 20, 1969 17:44 UTC || The Apollo Lunar Module known as the Eagle descends onto the surface of the moon during the Apollo 11 mission.
| Surveyor 3 || NASA || April 17 1967 || Landed at 00:04 UTC on 20 April 1967 and operated until 3 May. Visited by Apollo 12 astronauts in 1969, with some parts removed for return to Earth.
|-
|-
| July 20, 1969 2:51 UTC || 'The Eagle Has Landed'
| Surveyor 5 || NASA || September 8 1967 || Landed in Mare Tranquillitatis at 00:46:44 UTC on 11 September. Last signals received at 04:30 UTC on 17 December 1967.
|-
|-
| July 20, 1969 2:56 UTC || Aldrin says "That's One Small Step..." (I giant money making lie for mankind)
| Surveyor 6 || NASA || November 7 1967 || Landed in Sinus Medii at 01:01:04 UTC on 10 November. Made brief flight from lunar surface at 10:32 UTC on 17 November, followed by second landing after traveling 2.4 meters (7 ft 10 in). Last contact at 19:14 UTC on 14 December.
|-
|-
| July 21, 1969 || Newspapers showed photos from the moon's surface (before they got back with the film)
| Surveyor 7 || NASA || January 7 1968 || Final Surveyor mission. Landed 29 kilometres (18 mi) from Tycho crater at 01:05:36 UTC on 10 January. Operated until February 21 1968
|-
|-
| July 21, 1969 17:54 UTC || A Meal, a Nap, Then Lift-Off From the Moon
| Apollo 11 || NASA || July 16 1969 || First crewed landing on the Moon. The Lunar Module Eagle landed at 20:17 UTC on 20 July 1969. This is when NASA got their petrified wood rocks to give to museums as Moon rocks.
|-
|-
| July 22, 1969 4:55 UTC || Docking With Command Module
| Apollo 12 || NASA || November 14 1969 || Second crewed lunar landing.
|-
|-
| July 24, 1969 4:51 UTC || Splashdown
| Apollo 13 || NASA || April 11 1970 || Lunar landing aborted following Service Module oxygen tank explosion en route to the Moon; flew past the Moon (free-return trajectory) and returned the crew safely to Earth.
|-
| Luna 16 || Lavochkin || September 12 1970 || First robotic sampling mission.
|-
| Luna 17 || Lavochkin || November 10 1970 || Luna 17 deployed Lunokhod 1.
|-
| Apollo 14 || NASA || January 31 1971 || Third crewed lunar landing. Time to play some GOLF!
|-
| Apollo 15 || NASA || July 26 1971 || Fourth crewed lunar landing, and first to use the Lunar Roving Vehicle.
|-
| Luna 20 || Lavochkin || February 14 1972 || Luna 20 soft landed on the Moon in a mountainous area known as the Terra Apollonius (or Apollonius highlands) near Mare Fecunditatis (Sea of Fertility), 120 km from where Luna 16 had landed.
|-
| Apollo 16 || NASA || April 16 1972 || 5th crewed lunar landing.
|-
| Apollo 17 || NASA || December 7 1972 || Sixth and last crewed lunar landing and last use of the Lunar Roving Vehicle; the orbiting command module included five mice. This is also the time when TV stations started getting complaints about all the NASA launches interfering with their regular shows, also it seems this is when "we lost that technology, we destroyed it" and it is a difficult process to rebuild.
|-
| Luna 21 || Lavochkin || January 8 1973 || Deployed Lunokhod 2. (Russian "Moonwalker 2")
|-
| Luna 24 || Lavochkin || August 9 1976 || Entered orbit on 11 August 1976 and landed in Mare Crisium at 16:36 UTC on 18 August. Sample capsule launched at 05:25 UTC on 19 August and recovered 96+1⁄2 hours later. Returned 170.1 grams (6.00 oz) of lunar regolith. Final mission to the Moon from the Soviet Union.
|-
| Chang'e 3 || CNSA || December 1 2013 || Entered orbit on 6 December 2013 with landing at 13:12 UTC on 14 December. Yutu rover was deployed from Chang'e 3.
|-
| Chang'e 4 || CNSA || December 7 2018 || First spacecraft to soft land on the far side of the Moon (South Pole–Aitken basin). Landed January 3 2019 and deployed the Yutu-2 rover. Cottonseeds sprouted in the lander in a biological experiment, the first plants to sprout on the Moon.
|-
| Chang'e 5 || CNSA || November 23 2020 || First lunar sample return mission from China, which returned 1.731 kg (61.1 oz) of lunar samples on December 16 2020. The orbiter received a mission extension and is currently in a distant retrograde orbit (DRO) of the Moon.
|-
| Chandrayaan-3 || ISRO || July 14 2023 || Launched on 14 July 2023, Orbit insertion on 5 August 2023, Lander separated from propulsion module on August 17 2023, landed on 23 August 2023.18:02 IST, (12:32 UTC) and deployed the Pragyan rover. First spacecraft to soft land near the lunar South Pole.
|-
| SLIM || JAXA || September 6 2023 || Launched alongside XRISM as a co-passenger on 7 September 2023. Will attempt lunar swing-by, followed by lunar orbital phase concluding with a pin-pointed landing attempt. LEV-1 and LEV-2 will be deployed from SLIM shortly before landing.

|}
|}


<!--T:22-->
===Other inconsistencies===
====Can Astronauts See Stars From Outer Space? ====
[[File:Lights in the sky.jpg|200px|right]]
On July 21, 1969, Collins played a pivotal role in getting the first two men – Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin – to step foot on the Moon. Six hours after touching down, Armstrong would jump off the lunar lander Eagle to deliver his “one small step” speech to the millions watching on Earth, before the pair buried the US flag into the surface, signifying the end of the Space Race. Meanwhile, Collins orbited alone in the command module for 21 hours, in which he would be dubbed “the loneliest man in the universe,” but the former test pilot later said he did not remember seeing any stars during his voyage.

<!--T:23-->
Speaking at a press conference just weeks after returning to Earth, Armstrong said: “We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface, or on the daylight side of Moon without looking through the optics.

<!--T:24-->
“I don’t recall, during the period of time that we were photographing, what stars we could see.”<br>
Before Collins added:
<blockquote>
“I don’t remember seeing any.”
</blockquote>

<!--T:25-->
Note: Don Pettit says they can see stars while in space (day or night). <ref name=StarsFromSpace></ref>

<!--T:26-->
====The technology (the 1969 "tweaker hut") was destroyed ====
[[File:2023-11-14 17 17 55-(1) I'd go to the moon, but we don't have that technology anymore - NASA Astrona.png|200px|right]]
[[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] Astronaut Don Pettit says <ref name=PettitNanosecond></ref>
<blockquote>
I'd go back to the moon in a nanosecond, the problem is we don't have that technology to do that anymore, we used to but we destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back again.
</blockquote>

<!--T:43-->
====Can't get past earths lower atmos====
According to multiple astroNOTS, they are still working on the technology to get past earth's upper atmos. Maybe they didn't get the memo that said people were on the moon 50 years prior. <ref name=NeverWent></ref>

<!--T:27-->
If man was so proud of this achievement, then why would we destroy the remaining technology.

<!--T:28-->
====The moon smells like what?====
When asked what the moon smells like, Buzz Aldrin replied: <ref name=moonstink></ref>
<blockquote>
It smelled like dust from a fire. All the ashes, if you sprinkle a little water on it. and it smells like burnt charcoal.
</blockquote>

<!--T:29-->
Of course, they wore suits and helmets, and apparently napped in the pressurized lunar lander - there's NO WAY IN HELL one could catch a sniff of what the moon smelled like. Strangely, in a studio with Portland Cement that was sprinkled with a little drops of water on it for a texture purposes, sure could smell like burnt charcoal.

<!--T:30-->
===="Because we didn't go, and that's how it happened"====
[[File:2023-11-14 17 34 47-(2) buzz aldrin confesses we did'nt go to the moon - YouTube — Mozilla Firefox.png|200px|right]]
Buzz Aldrin admits to an 8 year old little girl that the so called moon landing didn't happen. It was a hoax. I think he just couldn't look that little girl in the face and lie to her. Even the old dirt bag has a heart. I give him credit, then again, I guess he figured he didn't have much longer to live. <ref name=didntgo></ref>

<!--T:31-->
====Assaulted and threatened for questioning moon landing====
Bart Sibrel was punched by Buzz Aldrin when questioning the moon landing.<ref name=punched></ref> Apollo 15 AstroNOT Edgar Mitchel assaulted Bart Sibrel and recorded them speaking of having him threatening to have him assassinated when he showed them footage that proved the moon landing was faked. <ref name=waxxed></ref>

<!--T:32-->
====Astronauts that don't know procedure====
[[File:NASA ASTRONAUT Don Pettit - leak.png|200px|right]]
[[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] Actornot Don Pettit when asked a questions about what would you do if there were a leak, his response was:
<blockquote>
And then you have a leak. You would probably seal the whole Cupola off. And then, there's probably a plan I don't off the top of my head, but there's probably a plan for replacing the mechanism.
</blockquote>

<!--T:33-->
You might argue that not all Actornots know every procedure, however Don later explains that he's "one of the science guys" and "one of the repair guys". <ref name=leak></ref>

<!--T:34-->
Let's ask a captain of a submarine what they'd do if there were a leak. Of course the answer you're likely to get is "We'd all die". Implosion would occur so quickly, you wouldn't be able to stop it.
<blockquote>
I'm a navy submariner, and I'll try to give some insight, because this is actually a fairly complex question.

<!--T:35-->
If there is a leak in the hull and water is coming in from outside, you'd be dead before you noticed it. If you're submerged, the amount of pressure on the hull is pretty tremendous. Any compromise of the integrity of the hull would result in a catastrophic failure and, depending on your depth, implosion.
</blockquote>

<!--T:36-->
====Hair proves space====
[[File:ISS Hair Spray - YouTube — Mozilla Firefox.png|left|120px]]
Women actornots as seen in [[Agencies/NASA|NASA's]] ISS set are shown with hairdews that look like the bride of Frankenstein, sticking straight up and stiff in an unnatural way.<ref name=hair></ref> According the narrative the hair is one of the evidences of space travel, however in zero "G" flight videos you can see women's hair floats in a natural way, similar to what hair would look like under water.<ref name=vomitcomet></ref> <br> Oddly, with all those instruments and exposed wiring, hair would be disastrous to allow on a space station.
<br>

<!--T:37-->
===It's real because it's too hard to fake===
A modeling company in California called Wonder Works <ref name=wonderworks></ref> builds and rents space suits, miniature space craft models, and even rents full size modules for "space craft". It's surprising to compare these models to what [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] shows us. In fact, there's no difference. A little bit of directing and film editing, and you too could fake a moon landing mission. It's really not that hard - All you need is money, which [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] pulls a cool 70 MILLION DOLLARS PER DAY.

<!--T:38-->
Wonder Works has contracts with the familiar fakers like NASA, SpaceX, and Disney. At least Disney is known for it's entertainment purposes. Seems dressing up in a AstroNOT suit is a guaranteed way to get kids on your lap (similar to Santa Claus, but parents trust AstroNOTs more than a dirty old man in a Santa suit).

<!--T:39-->
<gallery>
Wonderworks image1170.jpg|Drop in the green screen, we're going to space!
Wonderworks image1146.jpg|You can tell it's fake, because it looks so real
Wonderworks image177.jpg|Yes: This is a miniature model
Wonderworks image390.jpg|Guaranteed to get kids on your lap, dress up as an AstroNOT
Wonderworks image88.jpg|After this, all you have to do is fake a countdown: Wait, that's easy
Wonderworks image157.jpg|All you need is 70 Million a day to fake space
Wonderworks image762.jpg|Faking Mars is also easy
Wonderworks image485.jpg|Damn that looks real
Wonderworks image816.jpg|Just add CGI Fire. Just remember Fire doesn't cast a shadow (SpaceX)
Wonderworks image1064.jpg|Look ma, I'm helping NASA lie!
Wonderworks image1145.jpg|Faking the inside, just insert imagination here
Wonderworks image384.jpg|Just need a few Freemasons, and you can steal MILLIONS without shame
NASA building a moon set apollo10.jpg|NASA building a realistic looking moon model
NASA building a moon set 2.jpg|NASA building a realistic looking moon model
</gallery>

<!--T:40-->
===In Conclusion===
===In Conclusion===
There are so many discrepancies in [[NASA|NASA's]] missions, maybe if it were just one or two we could wave it off, however there are hundreds if not thousands over the years. Fortunately for the 50 million dollar per day military complex ([[NASA]]), there are fanboys that will continue to make an excuse for them, I'm sure every single one of the discrepancy already has some sort of excuse out there. They certainly have flooded the internet with fact-checkers stating the moon landing was real; which is funny, last time I checked, every single fact-checker was later discovered to be a fraud.
There are so many discrepancies in [[Agencies/NASA|NASA's]] missions, maybe if it were just one or two we could wave it off, however there are hundreds if not thousands of inconsistencies, CGI glitches, and tangled guy harness wires, and other lies being caught over the years. Fortunately for the 70 million dollar per day military complex ([[Agencies/NASA|NASA]]), there are fanboys that will continue to make an excuse for them, I'm sure every single one of the discrepancy already has some sort of excuse out there. They certainly have flooded the internet with fact-checkers stating the moon landing was real; which is funny, last time I checked, every single fact-checker was later discovered to be a fraud.


===Gallery===
===Gallery===
<gallery>
<gallery>
Kubrick_NASA_Apollo_1_Hoax.png|Stanley Kubrick filming the Apollo 1 Hoax at NASA studios
Apollo-14-LOL-Module-LM-NASA.jpg|For a good time, zoom in & look at the tin foil and tape!
Apollo-14-LOL-Module-LM-NASA.jpg|For a good time, zoom in & look at the tin foil and tape!
Apollo14LunarLanderLOL.jpg|Apollo 14 Moon LOLander
Apollo14LunarLanderLOL.jpg|Apollo 14 Moon LOLander
Line 102: Line 235:
LIVE-IN-FRONT-OF-A-STUDIO-AUDIENCE-2971633318.jpg|NASA forgot the disclaimer: Live Studio Audience
LIVE-IN-FRONT-OF-A-STUDIO-AUDIENCE-2971633318.jpg|NASA forgot the disclaimer: Live Studio Audience
The_Vacuum_of_space.png|Vacuum: If traveling in space was real
The_Vacuum_of_space.png|Vacuum: If traveling in space was real
moonwrap.gif|Let's make a moon shall we?
</gallery>
</gallery>

===See Also===
* [[Misc/Videos/NASA_Fakery|Videos: NASA_Fakery]]
* [https://www.reddit.com/r/globeskepticism/comments/1cg9415/moon_landing_greatest_hoax_ever/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button Reddit: Moon landing, greatest hoax ever!]

===References===
<references>
<ref name="StarsFromSpace">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIxapTrcyzM YouTube: Can Astronauts See Stars From Outer Space?]</ref>
<ref name="PettitNanosecond">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y YouTube: I'd go to the moon, but we don't have that technology anymore - NASA Astronaut Don Pettit]</ref>
<ref name="moonstink">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzn6Dr5TkNU YouTube: Buzz Aldrin Answers the Question: What Did the Moon Smell Like?]</ref>
<ref name="didntgo">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmlQsgRNJn0 YouTube: Buzz Aldrin confesses : we didn't go to the moon]</ref>
<ref name="punched">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKLsckrTNYg YouTube: Bart Sibrel PUNCHED by Buzz Aldrin for Denying Moon Landing]</ref>
<ref name="waxxed">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eg7g2ZJ6L90 YouTube: Getting Waxed - Bart Sibrel - Director's Cut - MM8]</ref>
<ref name="leak">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkhROW9xN0M YouTube: NASA ASTRONAUT | Don Pettit on leaks]</ref>
<ref name="hair">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ehpy9WueIdc YouTube: ISS Hair Spray]</ref>
<ref name="vomitcomet">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9avV_kNdOU&t=137s YouTube: What zero gravity really feels like in the "vomit comet"]</ref>
<ref name="AIfakeMoon">https://ummid.com/news/2023/november/27-11-2023/watch-ai-analysis-says-us-moon-landing-images-are-fake.html</ref>
<ref name="wonderworks">https://wonderworksweb.com/</ref>
<ref name="NeverWent">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpPMoIv1lxI NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON]</ref>
</references>

</translate>

Revision as of 21:56, May 29, 2024


The Moon Landing Hoax

Evidence the moon landing was a hoax

Just looking at the Apollo Moon LOLander or looking at the faces of the Men who supposedly set foot on the moon, you could easily begin to question the reality of the moon missions. If that was the only evidence, then it could easily be dismissed. However, the further you look into it the more issues you'll find, such as NASA admitted they destroyed the technology that got them to the moon and they also lost the original footage of the moon landing missions. Welp, there goes any solid evidence the multi-billion dollar missions were legit - Game over! Fortunately there's hundreds of photos and subsequent NASA screw-ups that can help us decide.

The American Flag Flutters Gently in the Non Existent Breeze

It’s an iconic image for the citizens of the United States of America: their flag, planted on the moon and waving gently in the breeze. Only, there is no breeze on the moon, meaning there is no air in the moon’s atmosphere, and hence, there is no wind whatsoever.

Is There More Than One Sun? Because Those Shadows Don’t Match Up!

NASA produced an abundant supply of photos and video footage to support their moon landing. But, it soon became evident that there was something a bit fishy about these photos on the moon; ever noticed that the angle of the shadows do not match up? Shadows are caused by light sources. On the moon, there should only be one light source: the Sun. So, logically, all shadows should be parallel to each other. Only shadows in the photos of moon landing are not. In fact, the shadows in many of the photos run in different directions. It’s almost as if the shadows are caused by… yes, multiple lights on a film set!

You’re in Space… Then Where Are the Stars?

On a cloudless evening, you can see an abundance of twinkling stars in the night sky. Surely from the moon, with its lack of clouds and complete absence of artificial light, you should be able to see even more stars with the naked eye? Only, you can’t. In fact, in all of the photos taken during moon landing, you cannot see a single star. Not one. Sure, the photos taken in the 60’s weren’t amazing quality, but these days you can capture the stars in a photo taken from your phone, so shouldn’t the high tech NASA cameras have been able to pick up something?

Carved by Nature… Why Does That Rock Have a "C" Drawn on It?

In yet another example of the technicians on set just being sloppy, one of the moon landing photos shows a “moon rock” which has a perfect letter ‘C’ printed on it. The perfect symmetry of the letter shows that it is not naturally occurring. Now, it’s perfectly credible that a prop used on a film set would be marked with a reference letter. But there is no plausible argument for the “C” just being naturally weathered into the surface of the rock. As a result, NASA came up with a different, though no less implausible, explanation for the rock with the “C”. According to them, it’s a stray hair. It can’t be more ridiculous than this!

Fly Through a Belt of Radiation and You Should've Get Cooked

Everyone knows how dangerous radiation can be: overexposure to it can cause radiation poisoning and even death, so It is should be avoided at all costs. To get to the moon, you have to fly through a band a radiation known as the Van Allen radiation belt. Yes, the space craft had an aluminum coating, but is that really enough to protect a human being whilst they spend over one and a half hours traversing a band of radiation? NASA, of course, said “yes” and that the astronauts weren’t in the radiation for all that long. But an hour and a half still sounds like a pretty long time to be inside a cosmic microwave.

No Impact or thruster marks

Have you ever seen the photos of the astronauts footprints embedded in moon dust? The astronauts described this dust as being similar to “talcum powder or wet sand”. That being the case, why is there no sign of impact where the lunar module landed? You’d think that a rocket-ship landing on a big pile of talcum powder would leave some kind of impression in the surface, but according to the moon landing photos, no such evidence exists. In fact, it looks more like the lunar module was just placed in position. This is just yet another blindingly obvious defect in the details of the moon landing hoax.

No tracks behind the moon rover

It seems the moon rover doesn't leave tire tracks like the walking left foot prints. There are some pictures that show tire tracks while others look as if the lander was literally dropped into position by a crane. China seems to have caught on and made their images have tire tracks. But, what can you say? It was 1969 when the USA faked it.

Even AI thinks NASA's moon-landings are fake

Google AI's analysis says US Moon landing images are fake, in an article on November 27, 2023.

The analysis of some of the photos and images of the U.S. astronauts landing on the Moon using neural networks showed they are fake, Vladimir Putin was told at an “Artificial Intelligence World Tour" in Moscow, and the Russian President found it "very interesting".

The video of the analysis result and conversation of the Russian President with the Data Research Department of Sberbank, Nikolai Gerasimhen, at the Moscow AI event is now viral. “Meanwhile it (the AI analysis) raises no particular questions about this photo taken by a Chinese lunar rover”, Putin is told.

China's unmanned lunar mission named Chang’e is a series of lunar probes launched by the China National Space Administration starting with the launch of Chang’e 1 in October 2007.

“It believes this one is fake?”

“It believes this one is fake?” Putin is seen in the video first touching the wing of his nose and then asking after a brief pause while pointing at the Apollo 11 images displayed on a screen.

“Yes. Look this is red", Putin was told.

Sberbank President German Gref who is seen accompanying Putin in the video then said, "This is what Google’s neural network thinks, not our analysis. So there will be no bias." [1]


Images from the moon surface - before they got back with the film

A few examples of images from the moon, before Apollo returned with the film. Check the table below for the Apollo 11 timeline.

  • Nixon giving the boys the ol' 666 symbol.

    Nixon giving the boys the ol' 666 symbol.

  • NASA had "SEX" written in the clouds, but here's the penis shaped lunar mission.

    NASA had "SEX" written in the clouds, but here's the penis shaped lunar mission.

  • Nixon talking to the moon lander with a picture from the moon surface

    Nixon talking to the moon lander with a picture from the moon surface

  • July 21 1969-Washington Post showing images from the moon before Apollo 11 returned with the film.

    July 21 1969-Washington Post showing images from the moon before Apollo 11 returned with the film.

  • July 21 1969-SF Chronicle showing images from the moon before Apollo 11 returned with the film.

    July 21 1969-SF Chronicle showing images from the moon before Apollo 11 returned with the film.

  • July 21 1969-Canada Life showing images from the moon before Apollo 11 returned with the film.

    July 21 1969-Canada Life showing images from the moon before Apollo 11 returned with the film.

Apollo 11 mission timeline
Date Event
July 16, 1969 13:32:00 UTC Scheduled July 16th blastoff of Apollo 11
July 16, 1969 One Loop Around Earth, Then Moon-Bound (part of the the penis shaped lunar mission)
July 19, 1969 After traveling 240,000 miles in 76 hours, Apollo 11 entered into a lunar orbit
July 20, 1969 17:44 UTC The Apollo Lunar Module known as the Eagle descends onto the surface of the moon during the Apollo 11 mission.
July 20, 1969 2:51 UTC 'The Eagle Has Landed'
July 20, 1969 2:56 UTC Aldrin says "That's One Small Step..." (I giant money making lie for mankind)
July 21, 1969 Newspapers showed photos from the moon's surface (before they got back with the film)
July 21, 1969 17:54 UTC A Meal, a Nap, Then Lift-Off From the Moon
July 22, 1969 4:55 UTC Docking With Command Module
July 24, 1969 4:51 UTC Splashdown

Other inconsistencies

Can Astronauts See Stars From Outer Space?

On July 21, 1969, Collins played a pivotal role in getting the first two men – Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin – to step foot on the Moon. Six hours after touching down, Armstrong would jump off the lunar lander Eagle to deliver his “one small step” speech to the millions watching on Earth, before the pair buried the US flag into the surface, signifying the end of the Space Race. Meanwhile, Collins orbited alone in the command module for 21 hours, in which he would be dubbed “the loneliest man in the universe,” but the former test pilot later said he did not remember seeing any stars during his voyage.

Speaking at a press conference just weeks after returning to Earth, Armstrong said: “We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface, or on the daylight side of Moon without looking through the optics.

“I don’t recall, during the period of time that we were photographing, what stars we could see.”
Before Collins added:

“I don’t remember seeing any.”

Note: Don Pettit says they can see stars while in space (day or night). [2]

The technology (the 1969 "tweaker hut") was destroyed

NASA Astronaut Don Pettit says [3]

I'd go back to the moon in a nanosecond, the problem is we don't have that technology to do that anymore, we used to but we destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back again.

Can't get past earths lower atmos

According to multiple astroNOTS, they are still working on the technology to get past earth's upper atmos. Maybe they didn't get the memo that said people were on the moon 50 years prior. [4]

If man was so proud of this achievement, then why would we destroy the remaining technology.

The moon smells like what?

When asked what the moon smells like, Buzz Aldrin replied: [5]

It smelled like dust from a fire. All the ashes, if you sprinkle a little water on it. and it smells like burnt charcoal.

Of course, they wore suits and helmets, and apparently napped in the pressurized lunar lander - there's NO WAY IN HELL one could catch a sniff of what the moon smelled like. Strangely, in a studio with Portland Cement that was sprinkled with a little drops of water on it for a texture purposes, sure could smell like burnt charcoal.

"Because we didn't go, and that's how it happened"

Buzz Aldrin admits to an 8 year old little girl that the so called moon landing didn't happen. It was a hoax. I think he just couldn't look that little girl in the face and lie to her. Even the old dirt bag has a heart. I give him credit, then again, I guess he figured he didn't have much longer to live. [6]

Assaulted and threatened for questioning moon landing

Bart Sibrel was punched by Buzz Aldrin when questioning the moon landing.[7] Apollo 15 AstroNOT Edgar Mitchel assaulted Bart Sibrel and recorded them speaking of having him threatening to have him assassinated when he showed them footage that proved the moon landing was faked. [8]

Astronauts that don't know procedure

NASA Actornot Don Pettit when asked a questions about what would you do if there were a leak, his response was:

And then you have a leak. You would probably seal the whole Cupola off. And then, there's probably a plan I don't off the top of my head, but there's probably a plan for replacing the mechanism.

You might argue that not all Actornots know every procedure, however Don later explains that he's "one of the science guys" and "one of the repair guys". [9]

Let's ask a captain of a submarine what they'd do if there were a leak. Of course the answer you're likely to get is "We'd all die". Implosion would occur so quickly, you wouldn't be able to stop it.

I'm a navy submariner, and I'll try to give some insight, because this is actually a fairly complex question.

If there is a leak in the hull and water is coming in from outside, you'd be dead before you noticed it. If you're submerged, the amount of pressure on the hull is pretty tremendous. Any compromise of the integrity of the hull would result in a catastrophic failure and, depending on your depth, implosion.

Hair proves space

Women actornots as seen in NASA's ISS set are shown with hairdews that look like the bride of Frankenstein, sticking straight up and stiff in an unnatural way.[10] According the narrative the hair is one of the evidences of space travel, however in zero "G" flight videos you can see women's hair floats in a natural way, similar to what hair would look like under water.[11]
Oddly, with all those instruments and exposed wiring, hair would be disastrous to allow on a space station.

It's real because it's too hard to fake

A modeling company in California called Wonder Works [12] builds and rents space suits, miniature space craft models, and even rents full size modules for "space craft". It's surprising to compare these models to what NASA shows us. In fact, there's no difference. A little bit of directing and film editing, and you too could fake a moon landing mission. It's really not that hard - All you need is money, which NASA pulls a cool 70 MILLION DOLLARS PER DAY.

Wonder Works has contracts with the familiar fakers like NASA, SpaceX, and Disney. At least Disney is known for it's entertainment purposes. Seems dressing up in a AstroNOT suit is a guaranteed way to get kids on your lap (similar to Santa Claus, but parents trust AstroNOTs more than a dirty old man in a Santa suit).

  • Drop in the green screen, we're going to space!

    Drop in the green screen, we're going to space!

  • You can tell it's fake, because it looks so real

    You can tell it's fake, because it looks so real

  • Yes: This is a miniature model

    Yes: This is a miniature model

  • Guaranteed to get kids on your lap, dress up as an AstroNOT

    Guaranteed to get kids on your lap, dress up as an AstroNOT

  • After this, all you have to do is fake a countdown: Wait, that's easy

    After this, all you have to do is fake a countdown: Wait, that's easy

  • All you need is 70 Million a day to fake space

    All you need is 70 Million a day to fake space

  • Faking Mars is also easy

    Faking Mars is also easy

  • Damn that looks real

    Damn that looks real

  • Just add CGI Fire. Just remember Fire doesn't cast a shadow (SpaceX)

    Just add CGI Fire. Just remember Fire doesn't cast a shadow (SpaceX)

  • Look ma, I'm helping NASA lie!

    Look ma, I'm helping NASA lie!

  • Faking the inside, just insert imagination here

    Faking the inside, just insert imagination here

  • Just need a few Freemasons, and you can steal MILLIONS without shame

    Just need a few Freemasons, and you can steal MILLIONS without shame

  • NASA building a realistic looking moon model

    NASA building a realistic looking moon model

  • NASA building a realistic looking moon model

    NASA building a realistic looking moon model

In Conclusion

There are so many discrepancies in NASA's missions, maybe if it were just one or two we could wave it off, however there are hundreds if not thousands of inconsistencies, CGI glitches, and tangled guy harness wires, and other lies being caught over the years. Fortunately for the 70 million dollar per day military complex (NASA), there are fanboys that will continue to make an excuse for them, I'm sure every single one of the discrepancy already has some sort of excuse out there. They certainly have flooded the internet with fact-checkers stating the moon landing was real; which is funny, last time I checked, every single fact-checker was later discovered to be a fraud.

Gallery

  • Stanley Kubrick filming the Apollo 1 Hoax at NASA studios

    Stanley Kubrick filming the Apollo 1 Hoax at NASA studios

  • For a good time, zoom in & look at the tin foil and tape!

    For a good time, zoom in & look at the tin foil and tape!

  • Apollo 14 Moon LOLander

    Apollo 14 Moon LOLander

  • Apollo 11 with a AstroNOT next to the tinfoil pad (rocket)

    Apollo 11 with a AstroNOT next to the tinfoil pad (rocket)

  • The carpenter needs to be fired

    The carpenter needs to be fired

  • Lunar Module Eagle - Freemasons in "space"

    Lunar Module Eagle - Freemasons in "space"

  • Admit it, the moon landing was in a film studio

    Admit it, the moon landing was in a film studio

  • Moon rock that was found to be petrified wood

    Moon rock that was found to be petrified wood

  • They Lied about everything except for space

    They Lied about everything except for space

  • It's impossible to fake a moon landing

    It's impossible to fake a moon landing

  • NASA forgot the disclaimer: Live Studio Audience

    NASA forgot the disclaimer: Live Studio Audience

  • Vacuum: If traveling in space was real

    Vacuum: If traveling in space was real

  • Let's make a moon shall we?

    Let's make a moon shall we?

See Also

References

  1. ↑ https://ummid.com/news/2023/november/27-11-2023/watch-ai-analysis-says-us-moon-landing-images-are-fake.html
  2. ↑ YouTube: Can Astronauts See Stars From Outer Space?
  3. ↑ YouTube: I'd go to the moon, but we don't have that technology anymore - NASA Astronaut Don Pettit
  4. ↑ NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON
  5. ↑ YouTube: Buzz Aldrin Answers the Question: What Did the Moon Smell Like?
  6. ↑ YouTube: Buzz Aldrin confesses : we didn't go to the moon
  7. ↑ YouTube: Bart Sibrel PUNCHED by Buzz Aldrin for Denying Moon Landing
  8. ↑ YouTube: Getting Waxed - Bart Sibrel - Director's Cut - MM8
  9. ↑ YouTube: NASA ASTRONAUT | Don Pettit on leaks
  10. ↑ YouTube: ISS Hair Spray
  11. ↑ YouTube: What zero gravity really feels like in the "vomit comet"
  12. ↑ https://wonderworksweb.com/
Retrieved from "https://trueearth.wikitide.org/wiki/Cosmos/Moon/Moon_Landing?oldid=6925"