Cosmos/Moon/Moon Landing

The Moon Landing Hoax(es)

Evidence the moon landing was a hoax

Just looking at the Apollo Moon LOLander or looking at the faces of the Men who supposedly set foot on the moon, you could easily begin to question the reality of the moon missions. If that was the only evidence, then it could easily be dismissed. However, the further you look into it the more issues you'll find, such as NASA admitted they destroyed the technology that got them to the moon and they also lost the original footage of the moon landing missions. Welp, there goes any solid evidence the multi-billion dollar missions were legit - Game over! Fortunately there's hundreds of photos and subsequent NASA screw-ups that can help us decide.

The American Flag Flutters Gently in the Non Existent Breeze

It’s an iconic image for the citizens of the United States of America: their flag, planted on the moon and waving gently in the breeze. Only, there is no breeze on the moon, meaning there is no air in the moon’s atmosphere, and hence, there is no wind whatsoever.

Is There More Than One Sun? Because Those Shadows Don’t Match Up!

NASA produced an abundant supply of photos and video footage to support their moon landing. But, it soon became evident that there was something a bit fishy about these photos on the moon; ever noticed that the angle of the shadows do not match up? Shadows are caused by light sources. On the moon, there should only be one light source: the Sun. So, logically, all shadows should be parallel to each other. Only shadows in the photos of moon landing are not. In fact, the shadows in many of the photos run in different directions. It’s almost as if the shadows are caused by… yes, multiple lights on a film set!

You’re in Space… Then Where Are the Stars?

On a cloudless evening, you can see an abundance of twinkling stars in the night sky. Surely from the moon, with its lack of clouds and complete absence of artificial light, you should be able to see even more stars with the naked eye? Only, you can’t. In fact, in all of the photos taken during moon landing, you cannot see a single star. Not one. Sure, the photos taken in the 60’s weren’t amazing quality, but these days you can capture the stars in a photo taken from your phone, so shouldn’t the high tech NASA cameras have been able to pick up something?

Carved by Nature… Why Does That Rock Have a "C" Drawn on It?

In yet another example of the technicians on set just being sloppy, one of the moon landing photos shows a “moon rock” which has a perfect letter ‘C’ printed on it. The perfect symmetry of the letter shows that it is not naturally occurring. Now, it’s perfectly credible that a prop used on a film set would be marked with a reference letter. But there is no plausible argument for the “C” just being naturally weathered into the surface of the rock. As a result, NASA came up with a different, though no less implausible, explanation for the rock with the “C”. According to them, it’s a stray hair. It can’t be more ridiculous than this!

Fly Through a Belt of Radiation and You Should've Get Cooked

Everyone knows how dangerous radiation can be: overexposure to it can cause radiation poisoning and even death, so It is should be avoided at all costs. To get to the moon, you have to fly through a band a radiation known as the Van Allen radiation belt. Yes, the space craft had an aluminum coating, but is that really enough to protect a human being whilst they spend over one and a half hours traversing a band of radiation? NASA, of course, said “yes” and that the astronauts weren’t in the radiation for all that long. But an hour and a half still sounds like a pretty long time to be inside a cosmic microwave.

No Impact or thruster marks

Have you ever seen the photos of the astronauts footprints embedded in moon dust? The astronauts described this dust as being similar to “talcum powder or wet sand”. That being the case, why is there no sign of impact where the lunar module landed? You’d think that a rocket-ship landing on a big pile of talcum powder would leave some kind of impression in the surface, but according to the moon landing photos, no such evidence exists. In fact, it looks more like the lunar module was just placed in position. This is just yet another blindingly obvious defect in the details of the moon landing hoax.

No tracks behind the moon rover

It seems the moon rover doesn't leave tire tracks like the walking left foot prints. There are some pictures that show tire tracks while others look as if the lander was literally dropped into position by a crane. China seems to have caught on and made their images have tire tracks. But, what can you say? It was 1969 when the USA faked it.

In Conclusion

There are so many discrepancies in NASA's moon missions, maybe if it were just one or two we could wave it off, however there are hundreds if not thousands over the years. Fortunately for the 50 million dollar per day military complex (NASA), there are fanboys that will continue to make an excuse for them, I'm sure every single one of the discrepancy already has some sort of excuse out there. They certainly have flooded the internet with fact-checkers stating the moon landing was real; which is funny, last time I checked, every single fact-checker was later discovered to be a fraud.

Gallery

• 

  For a good time, zoom in & look at the tin foil and tape!

• 

  Apollo 14 Moon LOLander

• 

  Apollo 11 with a AstroNOT next to the tinfoil pad (rocket)

• 

  The carpenter needs to be fired

• 

  Lunar Module Eagle - Freemasons in "space"

• 

  Admit it, the moon landing was in a film studio

• 

  Moon rock that was found to be petrified wood

• 

  They Lied about everything except for space

• 

  It's impossible to fake a moon landing

• 

  NASA forgot the disclaimer: Live Studio Audience