Cosmos/Moon/Moon Landing

The Moon Landing Hoax(es)

Evidence the moon landing was a hoax

Just looking at the Apollo Moon LOLander or looking at the faces of the Men who supposedly set foot on the moon, you could easily begin to question the reality of the moon missions. If that was the only evidence, then it could easily be dismissed. However, the further you look into it the more issues you'll find, such as NASA admitted they destroyed the technology that got them to the moon and they also lost the original footage of the moon landing missions. Welp, there goes any solid evidence the multi-billion dollar missions were legit - Game over! Fortunately there's hundreds of photos and subsequent NASA screw-ups that can help us decide.

The American Flag Flutters Gently in the Non Existent Breeze

It’s an iconic image for the citizens of the United States of America: their flag, planted on the moon and waving gently in the breeze. Only, there is no breeze on the moon, meaning there is no air in the moon’s atmosphere, and hence, there is no wind whatsoever.

Is There More Than One Sun? Because Those Shadows Don’t Match Up!

NASA produced an abundant supply of photos and video footage to support their moon landing. But, it soon became evident that there was something a bit fishy about these photos on the moon; ever noticed that the angle of the shadows do not match up? Shadows are caused by light sources. On the moon, there should only be one light source: the Sun. So, logically, all shadows should be parallel to each other. Only shadows in the photos of moon landing are not. In fact, the shadows in many of the photos run in different directions. It’s almost as if the shadows are caused by… yes, multiple lights on a film set!

You’re in Space… Then Where Are the Stars?

On a cloudless evening, you can see an abundance of twinkling stars in the night sky. Surely from the moon, with its lack of clouds and complete absence of artificial light, you should be able to see even more stars with the naked eye? Only, you can’t. In fact, in all of the photos taken during moon landing, you cannot see a single star. Not one. Sure, the photos taken in the 60’s weren’t amazing quality, but these days you can capture the stars in a photo taken from your phone, so shouldn’t the high tech NASA cameras have been able to pick up something?

Carved by Nature… Why Does That Rock Have a "C" Drawn on It?

In yet another example of the technicians on set just being sloppy, one of the moon landing photos shows a “moon rock” which has a perfect letter ‘C’ printed on it. The perfect symmetry of the letter shows that it is not naturally occurring. Now, it’s perfectly credible that a prop used on a film set would be marked with a reference letter. But there is no plausible argument for the “C” just being naturally weathered into the surface of the rock. As a result, NASA came up with a different, though no less implausible, explanation for the rock with the “C”. According to them, it’s a stray hair. It can’t be more ridiculous than this!

Fly Through a Belt of Radiation and You Should've Get Cooked

Everyone knows how dangerous radiation can be: overexposure to it can cause radiation poisoning and even death, so It is should be avoided at all costs. To get to the moon, you have to fly through a band a radiation known as the Van Allen radiation belt. Yes, the space craft had an aluminum coating, but is that really enough to protect a human being whilst they spend over one and a half hours traversing a band of radiation? NASA, of course, said “yes” and that the astronauts weren’t in the radiation for all that long. But an hour and a half still sounds like a pretty long time to be inside a cosmic microwave.

No Impact or thruster marks

Have you ever seen the photos of the astronauts footprints embedded in moon dust? The astronauts described this dust as being similar to “talcum powder or wet sand”. That being the case, why is there no sign of impact where the lunar module landed? You’d think that a rocket-ship landing on a big pile of talcum powder would leave some kind of impression in the surface, but according to the moon landing photos, no such evidence exists. In fact, it looks more like the lunar module was just placed in position. This is just yet another blindingly obvious defect in the details of the moon landing hoax.

No tracks behind the moon rover

It seems the moon rover doesn't leave tire tracks like the walking left foot prints. There are some pictures that show tire tracks while others look as if the lander was literally dropped into position by a crane. China seems to have caught on and made their images have tire tracks. But, what can you say? It was 1969 when the USA faked it.

Timeline of "successful" Lunar Lander "missions"

"if you believe, they put a man on the moon"

Craft	Agency	Date	Description
Luna 9	Lavochkin	January 31 1966	First spacecraft to land successfully on the Moon. Touchdown on 3 February 1966 at 18:45:30 UTC. Returned data until 6 February at 22:55 UTC.
Surveyor 1	NASA	May 30 1966	Landed in Oceanus Procellarum on 2 June 1966 at 06:17:36 UTC. Returned data until loss of power on 13 July.
Luna 13	Lavochkin	December 21 1966	Successfully landed in Oceanus Procellarum at 18:01 UTC on 24 December 1966. Returned images from the surface and studied the lunar soil. Operated until depletion of power at 06:31 UTC on 28 December.
Surveyor 3	NASA	April 17 1967	Landed at 00:04 UTC on 20 April 1967 and operated until 3 May. Visited by Apollo 12 astronauts in 1969, with some parts removed for return to Earth.
Surveyor 5	NASA	September 8 1967	Landed in Mare Tranquillitatis at 00:46:44 UTC on 11 September. Last signals received at 04:30 UTC on 17 December 1967.
Surveyor 6	NASA	November 7 1967	Landed in Sinus Medii at 01:01:04 UTC on 10 November. Made brief flight from lunar surface at 10:32 UTC on 17 November, followed by second landing after traveling 2.4 meters (7 ft 10 in). Last contact at 19:14 UTC on 14 December.
Surveyor 7	NASA	January 7 1968	Final Surveyor mission. Landed 29 kilometres (18 mi) from Tycho crater at 01:05:36 UTC on 10 January. Operated until February 21 1968
Apollo 11	NASA	July 16 1969	First crewed landing on the Moon. The Lunar Module Eagle landed at 20:17 UTC on 20 July 1969. This is when NASA got their petrified wood rocks to give to museums as Moon rocks.
Apollo 12	NASA	November 14 1969	Second crewed lunar landing.
Apollo 13	NASA	April 11 1970	Lunar landing aborted following Service Module oxygen tank explosion en route to the Moon; flew past the Moon (free-return trajectory) and returned the crew safely to Earth.
Luna 16	Lavochkin	September 12 1970	First robotic sampling mission.
Luna 17	Lavochkin	November 10 1970	Luna 17 deployed Lunokhod 1.
Apollo 14	NASA	January 31 1971	Third crewed lunar landing. Time to play some GOLF!
Apollo 15	NASA	July 26 1971	Fourth crewed lunar landing, and first to use the Lunar Roving Vehicle.
Luna 20	Lavochkin	February 14 1972	Luna 20 soft landed on the Moon in a mountainous area known as the Terra Apollonius (or Apollonius highlands) near Mare Fecunditatis (Sea of Fertility), 120 km from where Luna 16 had landed.
Apollo 16	NASA	April 16 1972	5th crewed lunar landing.
Apollo 17	NASA	December 7 1972	Sixth and last crewed lunar landing and last use of the Lunar Roving Vehicle; the orbiting command module included five mice. This is also the time when TV stations started getting complaints about all the NASA launches interfering with their regular shows, also it seems this is when "we lost that technology, we destroyed it" and it is a difficult process to rebuild.
Luna 21	Lavochkin	January 8 1973	Deployed Lunokhod 2. (Russian "Moonwalker 2")
Luna 24	Lavochkin	August 9 1976	Entered orbit on 11 August 1976 and landed in Mare Crisium at 16:36 UTC on 18 August. Sample capsule launched at 05:25 UTC on 19 August and recovered 96+1⁄2 hours later. Returned 170.1 grams (6.00 oz) of lunar regolith. Final mission to the Moon from the Soviet Union.
Chang'e 3	CNSA	December 1 2013	Entered orbit on 6 December 2013 with landing at 13:12 UTC on 14 December. Yutu rover was deployed from Chang'e 3.
Chang'e 4	CNSA	December 7 2018	First spacecraft to soft land on the far side of the Moon (South Pole–Aitken basin). Landed January 3 2019 and deployed the Yutu-2 rover. Cottonseeds sprouted in the lander in a biological experiment, the first plants to sprout on the Moon.
Chang'e 5	CNSA	November 23 2020	First lunar sample return mission from China, which returned 1.731 kg (61.1 oz) of lunar samples on December 16 2020. The orbiter received a mission extension and is currently in a distant retrograde orbit (DRO) of the Moon.
Chandrayaan-3	ISRO	July 14 2023	Launched on 14 July 2023, Orbit insertion on 5 August 2023, Lander separated from propulsion module on August 17 2023, landed on 23 August 2023.18:02 IST, (12:32 UTC) and deployed the Pragyan rover. First spacecraft to soft land near the lunar South Pole.
SLIM	JAXA	September 6 2023	Launched alongside XRISM as a co-passenger on 7 September 2023. Will attempt lunar swing-by, followed by lunar orbital phase concluding with a pin-pointed landing attempt. LEV-1 and LEV-2 will be deployed from SLIM shortly before landing.

In Conclusion

There are so many discrepancies in NASA's moon missions, maybe if it were just one or two we could wave it off, however there are hundreds if not thousands over the years. Fortunately for the 50 million dollar per day military complex (NASA), there are fanboys that will continue to make an excuse for them, I'm sure every single one of the discrepancy already has some sort of excuse out there. They certainly have flooded the internet with fact-checkers stating the moon landing was real; which is funny, last time I checked, every single fact-checker was later discovered to be a fraud.

Gallery

• 

  For a good time, zoom in & look at the tin foil and tape!

• 

  Apollo 14 Moon LOLander

• 

  Apollo 11 with a AstroNOT next to the tinfoil pad (rocket)

• 

  The carpenter needs to be fired

• 

  Lunar Module Eagle - Freemasons in "space"

• 

  Admit it, the moon landing was in a film studio

• 

  Moon rock that was found to be petrified wood

• 

  They Lied about everything except for space

• 

  It's impossible to fake a moon landing

• 

  NASA forgot the disclaimer: Live Studio Audience

• 

  Vacuum: If traveling in space was real