FAQ/Satellites: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<languages /> |
|||
<translate> |
|||
== What are Satellites? == |
== What are Satellites? == |
||
[[File: |
[[File:Satellitesgiphy-ezgif.com-webp-to-gif-converter.gif|right|200px]] |
||
===What is a Satellite?=== |
|||
⚫ | |||
Accoring to the wikipedia, A "satellite" or "artificial satellite" is an object, placed into orbit around a celestial body (up in the sky). Satellites have a variety of uses, including communication relay, weather forecasting, navigation (GPS), broadcasting, scientific research, and Earth observation. Additional military uses are reconnaissance, early warning, signals intelligence and, potentially, weapon delivery. |
|||
===Satellites in "space"?=== |
|||
⚫ | |||
<big>10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1 - LIFTOFF!</big> |
<big>10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1 - LIFTOFF!</big> |
||
Line 8: | Line 14: | ||
* Forget that services haven't actually improved in decades. |
* Forget that services haven't actually improved in decades. |
||
* Forget that they complain about the fossil fuels cause greenhouse effects and fact they use thousands of times more fuel to send up a rocket (that dumps into the ocean) |
* Forget that they complain about the fossil fuels cause greenhouse effects and fact they use thousands of times more fuel to send up a rocket (that later dumps into the ocean). |
||
====The problem is, IT'S ALL FAKE!==== |
====The problem is, IT'S ALL FAKE!==== |
||
[[File:Balloon-clipart-free-clip-art-images-115x170.jpg|80px|right]] |
[[File:Balloon-clipart-free-clip-art-images-115x170.jpg|80px|right]] |
||
Satellites are BALLOONS! Yes, a tin can floating with a balloon (like what you give to your kid for their birthday only bigger and costing us millions and millions of dollars). |
Satellites are BALLOONS! Yes, a tin can floating with a balloon (like what you give to your kid for their birthday only much much bigger (football stadium size) and costing us millions and millions of dollars). |
||
=== |
===Satellite Coordinate System=== |
||
[[File:ISS_over_flat_earth.gif|thumb|ISS Path over flat earth & globe]] |
|||
Why would somebody lie about a multi-million dollar satellite being sent up on a multi-million dollar rocket when all they do is just send up a balloon? Follow the money - It's all a deception to make you believe that the cost of sending satellites up is very expensive to justify their '''$60,000,000.00 per DAY''' budget at [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] (yes, NASA costs us 60 MILLION DOLLAR per <big>DAY</big>), not to mention, it's helpful in keeping the fake space fantasy alive. Check the [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] page and look for reason's that we're being charged for CGI and balloons, you might find that the [[Agencies/NASA#NASA_a_Military_Complex?|NASA]] military complex is spending much of our money, and it's resources, planning efficient ways to kill people in the event humans "take over" the planet in an "unsustainable" way. (Guess what the news is saying about population right now?) |
|||
Satellites require an ECEF (Earth Centered Earth Fixed) Coordinate system, have to then impose an ECI (Earth Centered Inertial) frame for theoretical relativistic correction, and account for REAL inertial forces rotating around a geostatic position (Centrifugal, Coriolis, and Euler forces) as if “space” moves around a stationary earth. The orbital paths would be ellipses over a plane, a simple coordinate transform to spherical coordinates and you would never know the difference. |
|||
If satellites launched by NASA and other space agencies were proof of anything, it would prove geocentricity and explicitly refute heliocentrism. In fact, the satellites have to account for a change in velocity relative to the center of the ECI and have to correct for anisotropic signal propagation (variant speed of light with a preferred direction), both of which explicitly falsify Relativity. Without Relativity, Michelson-Morley (and subsequent replication with superior precision) proves the earth does not move through space. Long story short, the physics and equations applied for these satellites would quite literally prove the earth to be at rest. |
|||
GPS keeps times in a local reference frame via a range measurement equation. Kinematically, both of these frames are equivalent to being stationary. They're both synced to that ECI reference frame, so these measurements are going to be done in that frame. And then the ECEF reference frame is also synced to the same time. With that, they should have a really accurate way to measure distance down to the millimeter. <ref name=KinematicsvsDynamics></ref> |
|||
According to Mathematical Covariance and the assumed speed of C, having a fixed speed they should be able to take that distance and put it on any coordinate system based on the same time and have accurate distances for everything. A Very early adaption of the varying speed of the light, but disguised as an effect of rotation on a system. |
|||
The sagnac correction is not to account for anything in a revolving system, but to account for the C+V variant speed of light covered up by the ECI reference frame being synced with sidereal time. <ref name=SatelliteCoordinateSystem></ref> |
|||
=== This is NOT a Satellite === |
=== This is NOT a Satellite === |
||
Line 23: | Line 37: | ||
SpaceSatelliteCGI.jpg|A CGI "Satellite" in "Space" |
SpaceSatelliteCGI.jpg|A CGI "Satellite" in "Space" |
||
SatelliteCGIRelease.jpg|A CGI "Satellite" being released from a CGI rocket in "Space" |
SatelliteCGIRelease.jpg|A CGI "Satellite" being released from a CGI rocket in "Space" |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
</gallery> |
</gallery> |
||
Line 54: | Line 57: | ||
The increase in satellite traffic has also caused concern about the increased risk of collisions, both from active satellites and from defective satellites that can no longer maneuver to avoid collisions. [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] wrote to the FCC on October 29, 2020, to express concern that the increase in large constellation proposals to the FCC could cause a significant increase in the frequency of conjuncture events. (Too many balloons oh my!) |
The increase in satellite traffic has also caused concern about the increased risk of collisions, both from active satellites and from defective satellites that can no longer maneuver to avoid collisions. [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] wrote to the FCC on October 29, 2020, to express concern that the increase in large constellation proposals to the FCC could cause a significant increase in the frequency of conjuncture events. (Too many balloons oh my!) |
||
===What about the Himawari?=== |
|||
The Himawari is said to be a geostationary satellite, operated by the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA). It's purpose is to support weather forecasting, tropical cyclone tracking, and meteorology research. |
|||
There are many who believe the Himawari provides live video of the "globe" earth, however the images have been proven to be stitched and curve faked using the blue marble data set, which utilizes a flat map and mapped onto a sphere shape. <ref name=Himawari></ref> |
|||
===Full of gas=== |
===Full of gas=== |
||
According to NPR, "The World Is Constantly Running Out Of Helium", <ref name=nprhelium></ref> however [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] consumes the most helium for their satellites and other scientific trickery; each hung on helium balloons the size of football stadiums). One of [[Agencies/NASA|NASA's]] current helium contracts (starting Oct. 1 2023, for two-years) costs taxpayers approximately $149 million. NASA requires helium to support the International Space Station Program (to hang tin cans on balloons) as well as the Orion Programs that support Artemis (satalloons). <ref name=nasahelium></ref> |
According to NPR, "The World Is Constantly Running Out Of Helium", <ref name=nprhelium></ref> however [[Agencies/NASA|NASA]] consumes the most helium for their satellites and other scientific trickery; each hung on helium balloons the size of football stadiums). One of [[Agencies/NASA|NASA's]] current helium contracts (starting Oct. 1 2023, for two-years) costs taxpayers approximately $149 million. NASA requires helium to support the International Space Station Program (to hang tin cans on balloons) as well as the Orion Programs that support Artemis (satalloons). <ref name=nasahelium></ref> |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
=== See Also === |
=== See Also === |
||
* See document of Balloons used for satellites in the Corona Program, Space and Missile Systems Center Los Angeles, CA. Air Force Base <ref name=Corona></ref> |
* See document of Balloons used for satellites in the Corona Program, Space and Missile Systems Center Los Angeles, CA. Air Force Base <ref name=Corona></ref> |
||
* See document "10 meter Sub-Orbital Large Balloon Reflector (LBR) - May 2014" <ref name=LBR></ref> |
* See document "10 meter Sub-Orbital Large Balloon Reflector (LBR) - May 2014" <ref name=LBR></ref> |
||
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvP5VK96KTk YouTube: Satellite crashes in Brazil] |
|||
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKGaDCA9yyc YouTube: NASA Launches Super-Pressure Balloon] |
|||
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjP3wV7bEoM YouTube: Space satellite falls into backyard in Saginaw County] |
|||
===References=== |
===References=== |
||
Line 71: | Line 93: | ||
<ref name="nprhelium">[https://www.npr.org/2019/11/01/775554343/the-world-is-constantly-running-out-of-helium-heres-why-it-matters NPR.org: The World Is Constantly Running Out Of Helium]</ref> |
<ref name="nprhelium">[https://www.npr.org/2019/11/01/775554343/the-world-is-constantly-running-out-of-helium-heres-why-it-matters NPR.org: The World Is Constantly Running Out Of Helium]</ref> |
||
<ref name="nasahelium">[https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-awards-contract-for-acquisition-of-gaseous-liquid-helium/ NASA.gov: NASA Awards Contract for Acquisition of Gaseous, Liquid Helium]</ref> |
<ref name="nasahelium">[https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-awards-contract-for-acquisition-of-gaseous-liquid-helium/ NASA.gov: NASA Awards Contract for Acquisition of Gaseous, Liquid Helium]</ref> |
||
<ref name="Himawari">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfY1tbP_wXs&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2F&feature=emb_logo YouTube: FAKING SPACE - Himawari Hoax]</ref> |
|||
<ref name="SatelliteCoordinateSystem">[https://publish.obsidian.md/shanesql/GPS publish.obsidian.md: Shane's GPS Satellite Database]</ref> |
|||
<ref name="KinematicsvsDynamics">[https://publish.obsidian.md/shanesql/Kinematics+vs+Dynamics publish.obsidian.md: Shane's Kinematics vs Dynamics]</ref> |
|||
</references> |
</references> |
||
</translate> |
Latest revision as of 16:21, July 16, 2024
What are Satellites?
![](http://static.miraheze.org/trueearthwiki/thumb/8/8d/Satellitesgiphy-ezgif.com-webp-to-gif-converter.gif/200px-Satellitesgiphy-ezgif.com-webp-to-gif-converter.gif)
What is a Satellite?
Accoring to the wikipedia, A "satellite" or "artificial satellite" is an object, placed into orbit around a celestial body (up in the sky). Satellites have a variety of uses, including communication relay, weather forecasting, navigation (GPS), broadcasting, scientific research, and Earth observation. Additional military uses are reconnaissance, early warning, signals intelligence and, potentially, weapon delivery.
Satellites in "space"?
Flip on your TV, you might get unlucky enough to witness NASA or Google faking the launch of a rocket to send another "Satellite" into "Space".
10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1 - LIFTOFF!
Rockets burning literally tons and tons of fuel... Birds flying by... Crowds cheering... Constant "blah, blah" from the news presenters!!! Hurray!!! Yes, another multi-million dollar dumpster in "Space" that promises to provide better services for mankind such as telecommunications, television, weather monitoring, or deep space exploration, who wouldn't be excited?
- Forget that services haven't actually improved in decades.
- Forget that they complain about the fossil fuels cause greenhouse effects and fact they use thousands of times more fuel to send up a rocket (that later dumps into the ocean).
The problem is, IT'S ALL FAKE!
![](http://static.miraheze.org/trueearthwiki/thumb/1/1d/Balloon-clipart-free-clip-art-images-115x170.jpg/80px-Balloon-clipart-free-clip-art-images-115x170.jpg)
Satellites are BALLOONS! Yes, a tin can floating with a balloon (like what you give to your kid for their birthday only much much bigger (football stadium size) and costing us millions and millions of dollars).
Satellite Coordinate System
![](http://static.miraheze.org/trueearthwiki/thumb/7/78/ISS_over_flat_earth.gif/300px-ISS_over_flat_earth.gif)
Satellites require an ECEF (Earth Centered Earth Fixed) Coordinate system, have to then impose an ECI (Earth Centered Inertial) frame for theoretical relativistic correction, and account for REAL inertial forces rotating around a geostatic position (Centrifugal, Coriolis, and Euler forces) as if “space” moves around a stationary earth. The orbital paths would be ellipses over a plane, a simple coordinate transform to spherical coordinates and you would never know the difference.
If satellites launched by NASA and other space agencies were proof of anything, it would prove geocentricity and explicitly refute heliocentrism. In fact, the satellites have to account for a change in velocity relative to the center of the ECI and have to correct for anisotropic signal propagation (variant speed of light with a preferred direction), both of which explicitly falsify Relativity. Without Relativity, Michelson-Morley (and subsequent replication with superior precision) proves the earth does not move through space. Long story short, the physics and equations applied for these satellites would quite literally prove the earth to be at rest.
GPS keeps times in a local reference frame via a range measurement equation. Kinematically, both of these frames are equivalent to being stationary. They're both synced to that ECI reference frame, so these measurements are going to be done in that frame. And then the ECEF reference frame is also synced to the same time. With that, they should have a really accurate way to measure distance down to the millimeter. [1]
According to Mathematical Covariance and the assumed speed of C, having a fixed speed they should be able to take that distance and put it on any coordinate system based on the same time and have accurate distances for everything. A Very early adaption of the varying speed of the light, but disguised as an effect of rotation on a system. The sagnac correction is not to account for anything in a revolving system, but to account for the C+V variant speed of light covered up by the ECI reference frame being synced with sidereal time. [2]
This is NOT a Satellite
Satellites are not sent up in rockets. Satellites that are shown on TV floating in "space" are always CGI adult cartoons.
-
A Fake "Satellite" "Launch"
-
A CGI "Satellite" in "Space"
-
A CGI "Satellite" being released from a CGI rocket in "Space"
What about telecommunication and internet around the world?
![World Internet Map](http://static.miraheze.org/trueearthwiki/thumb/e/e6/World_map_internet.jpg/200px-World_map_internet.jpg)
The internet and telephones still work on cables. It is possible that transceivers hung on balloons could manage some of the telecommunications and internet, but the majority are done with cables. See the map of the internet image.
Since 2013, the One Web satellite constellation claims the satellites are in a Medium Earth Orbit at altitude of 8,063 km (5,010 miles) and have an end-to-end round-trip latency of 238 ms for data services. SpaceX, OneWeb and Amazon all plan to launch more than 1000 satellites each
According to PC Magazine, in 2018, only 9% of America relied on satellites for Internet. [3] The rest of us rely on faster cheaper cable / fiber based internet access.
Satellite rocket launches are FAKE
![](http://static.miraheze.org/trueearthwiki/thumb/b/bf/SpaceLaunchArc.jpg/250px-SpaceLaunchArc.jpg)
NASA's rockets just dump into the ocean, of course they cut to full cartoon mode before they show that.
Although NASA is charging us billions dollars for Satellite launches and a CGI cartoons, In reality Satellites are launched from forklifts, hanging on balloons. [4]
While a sky full of satellites is good for internet users, astronomers have expressed concern that the increased number of objects in orbit is already interfering with scientific observations. The reflective surfaces of satellites have interfered with telescope images, and the use of radio spectrum also has the potential to cause disruption.
The increase in satellite traffic has also caused concern about the increased risk of collisions, both from active satellites and from defective satellites that can no longer maneuver to avoid collisions. NASA wrote to the FCC on October 29, 2020, to express concern that the increase in large constellation proposals to the FCC could cause a significant increase in the frequency of conjuncture events. (Too many balloons oh my!)
What about the Himawari?
The Himawari is said to be a geostationary satellite, operated by the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA). It's purpose is to support weather forecasting, tropical cyclone tracking, and meteorology research.
There are many who believe the Himawari provides live video of the "globe" earth, however the images have been proven to be stitched and curve faked using the blue marble data set, which utilizes a flat map and mapped onto a sphere shape. [5]
Full of gas
According to NPR, "The World Is Constantly Running Out Of Helium", [6] however NASA consumes the most helium for their satellites and other scientific trickery; each hung on helium balloons the size of football stadiums). One of NASA's current helium contracts (starting Oct. 1 2023, for two-years) costs taxpayers approximately $149 million. NASA requires helium to support the International Space Station Program (to hang tin cans on balloons) as well as the Orion Programs that support Artemis (satalloons). [7]
This is what Satellites really are
Satellites are actually devices hung on huge football stadium sized helium balloons and released. [8]
-
a NASA balloon"Satellite"
-
a NASA balloon "Satellite" launch
-
a NASA balloon "Satellite" crash
-
Google balloon "Satellite" crash
-
AstroNOT working on a satellite
-
More accurate than what NASA told us about satellites
See Also
- See document of Balloons used for satellites in the Corona Program, Space and Missile Systems Center Los Angeles, CA. Air Force Base [9]
- See document "10 meter Sub-Orbital Large Balloon Reflector (LBR) - May 2014" [10]
- YouTube: Satellite crashes in Brazil
- YouTube: NASA Launches Super-Pressure Balloon
- YouTube: Space satellite falls into backyard in Saginaw County
References
- ↑ publish.obsidian.md: Shane's Kinematics vs Dynamics
- ↑ publish.obsidian.md: Shane's GPS Satellite Database
- ↑ PCMag.com: Which Americans Rely on Satellite Internet?
- ↑ YouTube: NASA Glenn Research Center Balloon Mission Launch
- ↑ YouTube: FAKING SPACE - Himawari Hoax
- ↑ NPR.org: The World Is Constantly Running Out Of Helium
- ↑ NASA.gov: NASA Awards Contract for Acquisition of Gaseous, Liquid Helium
- ↑ YouTube: ALL SATELLITES ARE ON BALLOONS & 50K ft. (Audio starts at 5 minutes)
- ↑ PDF: Oct. 2003 Interview with Colonel Harold E. Mitchel - Corona Program Balloon/satellites
- ↑ PDF: 10 meter Sub-Orbital Large Balloon Reflector (LBR) - May 2014