Cosmos/Moon/Moon Landing/en

The Moon Landing Hoax

Evidence the moon landing was a hoax

Just looking at the Apollo Moon LOLander or looking at the faces of the Men who supposedly set foot on the moon, you could easily begin to question the reality of the moon missions. If that was the only evidence, then it could easily be dismissed. However, the further you look into it the more issues you'll find, such as Agencies/NASA admitted they destroyed the technology that got them to the moon and they also lost the original footage of the moon landing missions. Welp, there goes any solid evidence the multi-billion dollar missions were legit - Game over! Fortunately there's hundreds of photos and subsequent Agencies/NASA screw-ups that can help us decide.

The American Flag Flutters Gently in the Non Existent Breeze

It’s an iconic image for the citizens of the United States of America: their flag, planted on the moon and waving gently in the breeze. Only, there is no breeze on the moon, meaning there is no air in the moon’s atmosphere, and hence, there is no wind whatsoever.

Is There More Than One Sun? Because Those Shadows Don’t Match Up!

Agencies/NASA produced an abundant supply of photos and video footage to support their moon landing. But, it soon became evident that there was something a bit fishy about these photos on the moon; ever noticed that the angle of the shadows do not match up? Shadows are caused by light sources. On the moon, there should only be one light source: the Sun. So, logically, all shadows should be parallel to each other. Only shadows in the photos of moon landing are not. In fact, the shadows in many of the photos run in different directions. It’s almost as if the shadows are caused by… yes, multiple lights on a film set!

You’re in Space… Then Where Are the Stars?

On a cloudless evening, you can see an abundance of twinkling stars in the night sky. Surely from the moon, with its lack of clouds and complete absence of artificial light, you should be able to see even more stars with the naked eye? Only, you can’t. In fact, in all of the photos taken during moon landing, you cannot see a single star. Not one. Sure, the photos taken in the 60’s weren’t amazing quality, but these days you can capture the stars in a photo taken from your phone, so shouldn’t the high tech Agencies/NASA cameras have been able to pick up something?

Carved by Nature… Why Does That Rock Have a "C" Drawn on It?

In yet another example of the technicians on set just being sloppy, one of the moon landing photos shows a “moon rock” which has a perfect letter ‘C’ printed on it. The perfect symmetry of the letter shows that it is not naturally occurring. Now, it’s perfectly credible that a prop used on a film set would be marked with a reference letter. But there is no plausible argument for the “C” just being naturally weathered into the surface of the rock. As a result, Agencies/NASA came up with a different, though no less implausible, explanation for the rock with the “C”. According to them, it’s a stray hair. It can’t be more ridiculous than this!

Fly Through a Belt of Radiation and You Should've Get Cooked

Everyone knows how dangerous radiation can be: overexposure to it can cause radiation poisoning and even death, so It is should be avoided at all costs. To get to the moon, you have to fly through a band a radiation known as the Van Allen radiation belt. Yes, the space craft had an aluminum coating, but is that really enough to protect a human being whilst they spend over one and a half hours traversing a band of radiation? Agencies/NASA, of course, said “yes” and that the astronauts weren’t in the radiation for all that long. But an hour and a half still sounds like a pretty long time to be inside a cosmic microwave.

No Impact or thruster marks

Have you ever seen the photos of the astronauts footprints embedded in moon dust? The astronauts described this dust as being similar to “talcum powder or wet sand”. That being the case, why is there no sign of impact where the lunar module landed? You’d think that a rocket-ship landing on a big pile of talcum powder would leave some kind of impression in the surface, but according to the moon landing photos, no such evidence exists. In fact, it looks more like the lunar module was just placed in position. This is just yet another blindingly obvious defect in the details of the moon landing hoax.

No tracks behind the moon rover

It seems the moon rover doesn't leave tire tracks like the walking left foot prints. There are some pictures that show tire tracks while others look as if the lander was literally dropped into position by a crane. China seems to have caught on and made their images have tire tracks. But, what can you say? It was 1969 when the USA faked it.

Even AI thinks NASA's moon-landings are fake

Google AI's analysis says US Moon landing images are fake, in an article on November 27, 2023.

The analysis of some of the photos and images of the U.S. astronauts landing on the Moon using neural networks showed they are fake, Vladimir Putin was told at an “Artificial Intelligence World Tour" in Moscow, and the Russian President found it "very interesting".

The video of the analysis result and conversation of the Russian President with the Data Research Department of Sberbank, Nikolai Gerasimhen, at the Moscow AI event is now viral. “Meanwhile it (the AI analysis) raises no particular questions about this photo taken by a Chinese lunar rover”, Putin is told.

China's unmanned lunar mission named Chang’e is a series of lunar probes launched by the China National Space Administration starting with the launch of Chang’e 1 in October 2007.

“It believes this one is fake?”

“It believes this one is fake?” Putin is seen in the video first touching the wing of his nose and then asking after a brief pause while pointing at the Apollo 11 images displayed on a screen.

“Yes. Look this is red", Putin was told.

Sberbank President German Gref who is seen accompanying Putin in the video then said, "This is what Google’s neural network thinks, not our analysis. So there will be no bias." ^[1]

Images from the moon surface - before they got back with the film

A few examples of images from the moon, before Apollo returned with the film. Check the table below for the Apollo 11 timeline.

Nixon giving the boys the ol' 666 symbol.
NASA had "SEX" written in the clouds, but here's the penis shaped lunar mission.
Nixon talking to the moon lander with a picture from the moon surface
July 21 1969-Washington Post showing images from the moon before Apollo 11 returned with the film.
July 21 1969-SF Chronicle showing images from the moon before Apollo 11 returned with the film.
July 21 1969-Canada Life showing images from the moon before Apollo 11 returned with the film.

Apollo 11 mission timeline
Date	Event
July 16, 1969 13:32:00 UTC	Scheduled July 16th blastoff of Apollo 11
July 16, 1969	One Loop Around Earth, Then Moon-Bound (part of the the penis shaped lunar mission)
July 19, 1969	After traveling 240,000 miles in 76 hours, Apollo 11 entered into a lunar orbit
July 20, 1969 17:44 UTC	The Apollo Lunar Module known as the Eagle descends onto the surface of the moon during the Apollo 11 mission.
July 20, 1969 2:51 UTC	'The Eagle Has Landed'
July 20, 1969 2:56 UTC	Aldrin says "That's One Small Step..." (I giant money making lie for mankind)
July 21, 1969	Newspapers showed photos from the moon's surface (before they got back with the film)
July 21, 1969 17:54 UTC	A Meal, a Nap, Then Lift-Off From the Moon
July 22, 1969 4:55 UTC	Docking With Command Module
July 24, 1969 4:51 UTC	Splashdown

Other inconsistencies

Can Astronauts See Stars From Outer Space?

On July 21, 1969, Collins played a pivotal role in getting the first two men – Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin – to step foot on the Moon. Six hours after touching down, Armstrong would jump off the lunar lander Eagle to deliver his “one small step” speech to the millions watching on Earth, before the pair buried the US flag into the surface, signifying the end of the Space Race. Meanwhile, Collins orbited alone in the command module for 21 hours, in which he would be dubbed “the loneliest man in the universe,” but the former test pilot later said he did not remember seeing any stars during his voyage.

Speaking at a press conference just weeks after returning to Earth, Armstrong said: “We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface, or on the daylight side of Moon without looking through the optics.

“I don’t recall, during the period of time that we were photographing, what stars we could see.”
Before Collins added:

“I don’t remember seeing any.”

Note: Don Pettit says they can see stars while in space (day or night). ^[2]

The technology (the 1969 "tweaker hut") was destroyed

Agencies/NASA Astronaut Don Pettit says ^[3]

I'd go back to the moon in a nanosecond, the problem is we don't have that technology to do that anymore, we used to but we destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back again.

Can't get past earths lower atmos

According to multiple astroNOTS, they are still working on the technology to get past earth's upper atmos. Maybe they didn't get the memo that said people were on the moon 50 years prior. ^[4]

If man was so proud of this achievement, then why would we destroy the remaining technology.

The moon smells like what?

When asked what the moon smells like, Buzz Aldrin replied: ^[5]

It smelled like dust from a fire. All the ashes, if you sprinkle a little water on it. and it smells like burnt charcoal.

Of course, they wore suits and helmets, and apparently napped in the pressurized lunar lander - there's NO WAY IN HELL one could catch a sniff of what the moon smelled like. Strangely, in a studio with Portland Cement that was sprinkled with a little drops of water on it for a texture purposes, sure could smell like burnt charcoal.

"Because we didn't go, and that's how it happened"

Buzz Aldrin admits to an 8 year old little girl that the so called moon landing didn't happen. It was a hoax. I think he just couldn't look that little girl in the face and lie to her. Even the old dirt bag has a heart. I give him credit, then again, I guess he figured he didn't have much longer to live. ^[6]

Assaulted and threatened for questioning moon landing

Bart Sibrel was punched by Buzz Aldrin when questioning the moon landing.^[7] Apollo 15 AstroNOT Edgar Mitchel assaulted Bart Sibrel and recorded them speaking of having him threatening to have him assassinated when he showed them footage that proved the moon landing was faked. ^[8]

Astronauts that don't know procedure

NASA Actornot Don Pettit when asked a questions about what would you do if there were a leak, his response was:

And then you have a leak. You would probably seal the whole Cupola off. And then, there's probably a plan I don't off the top of my head, but there's probably a plan for replacing the mechanism.

You might argue that not all Actornots know every procedure, however Don later explains that he's "one of the science guys" and "one of the repair guys". ^[9]

Let's ask a captain of a submarine what they'd do if there were a leak. Of course the answer you're likely to get is "We'd all die". Implosion would occur so quickly, you wouldn't be able to stop it.

I'm a navy submariner, and I'll try to give some insight, because this is actually a fairly complex question.
If there is a leak in the hull and water is coming in from outside, you'd be dead before you noticed it. If you're submerged, the amount of pressure on the hull is pretty tremendous. Any compromise of the integrity of the hull would result in a catastrophic failure and, depending on your depth, implosion.

Hair proves space

Women actornots as seen in NASA's ISS set are shown with hairdews that look like the bride of Frankenstein, sticking straight up and stiff in an unnatural way.^[10] According the narrative the hair is one of the evidences of space travel, however in zero "G" flight videos you can see women's hair floats in a natural way, similar to what hair would look like under water.^[11]
Oddly, with all those instruments and exposed wiring, hair would be disastrous to allow on a space station.

It's real because it's too hard to fake

A modeling company in California called Wonder Works ^[12] builds and rents space suits, miniature space craft models, and even rents full size modules for "space craft". It's surprising to compare these models to what NASA shows us. In fact, there's no difference. A little bit of directing and film editing, and you too could fake a moon landing mission. It's really not that hard - All you need is money, which NASA pulls a cool 70 MILLION DOLLARS PER DAY.

Wonder Works has contracts with the familiar fakers like NASA, SpaceX, and Disney. At least Disney is known for it's entertainment purposes. Seems dressing up in a AstroNOT suit is a guaranteed way to get kids on your lap (similar to Santa Claus, but parents trust AstroNOTs more than a dirty old man in a Santa suit).

Drop in the green screen, we're going to space!
You can tell it's fake, because it looks so real
Yes: This is a miniature model
Guaranteed to get kids on your lap, dress up as an AstroNOT
After this, all you have to do is fake a countdown: Wait, that's easy
All you need is 70 Million a day to fake space
Faking Mars is also easy
Damn that looks real
Just add CGI Fire. Just remember Fire doesn't cast a shadow (SpaceX)
Look ma, I'm helping NASA lie!
Faking the inside, just insert imagination here
Just need a few Freemasons, and you can steal MILLIONS without shame

In Conclusion

There are so many discrepancies in NASA's missions, maybe if it were just one or two we could wave it off, however there are hundreds if not thousands of inconsistencies, CGI glitches, and tangled guy harness wires and over the years. Fortunately for the 70 million dollar per day military complex (NASA), there are fanboys that will continue to make an excuse for them, I'm sure every single one of the discrepancy already has some sort of excuse out there. They certainly have flooded the internet with fact-checkers stating the moon landing was real; which is funny, last time I checked, every single fact-checker was later discovered to be a fraud.