Cosmos/Stars
Stars
When you zoom in on stars with a telescope, you see amazing images. Some flicker, some changes colors, some look dull, some bright - they look completely amazing and different. The stars look absolutely nothing like NASA images. [1]
Some people send light sensitive cameras above the atmosphere and were not unable to see stars. More experiments needs to be done there - They are mysterious indeed. [2] [3]
Star Trails In The Northern And Southern 'Hemisphere'
All stars rotate East to West around Polaris just above the central North Pole like in a planetarium dome. The planetarium dome of our Earth however is so vast that the law of perspective doesn't allow you to see all the stars from any one vantage point. You can however see Polaris, Ursa Major/Minor and other Northern constellations from every point on Earth all the way to the Southern Tropic of Capricorn.
The supposed "South Pole star," Southern Crux and other outer constellations conversely can NOT be seen from every point in the Southern Hemi"sphere" the way Polaris can from every point in the North. Nor do the Southern constellations circle around it West to East as is claimed. All stars rise more or less in the East and set in the West, with the angle/inclination being based on where you are on Earth and what direction you're facing.
“Another thing is certain, that from within the equator the north pole star, and the constellations Ursa Major, Ursa Minor, and many others, can be seen from every meridian simultaneously; whereas in the south, from the equator, neither the so-called south pole star, nor the remarkable constellation of the Southern Cross, can be seen simultaneously from every meridian, showing that all the constellations of the south - pole star included - sweep over a great southern arc and across the meridian, from their rise in the evening to their setting in the morning. But if the earth is a globe, Sigma Octantis, a south pole star, and the Southern Cross, a southern circumpolar constellation, they would all be visible at the same time from every longitude on the same latitude, as is the case with the northern pole star and the northern circumpolar constellations. Such, however, is not the case.”
-Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (286)
Our limit vision and our senses have been hijacked. The heavens were reverse engineered.
“It has often been urged that the earth must be a globe, because the stars in the southern ‘hemisphere’ move round a south polar star; in the same way that those of the north revolve round the northern pole star. This is another instance of the sacrifice of truth, and denial of the evidence of our senses for the purpose of supporting a theory which is in every sense false and unnatural. It is known to every observer that the north pole star is the centre of a number of constellations which move over the earth in a circular direction. Those nearest to it, as the ‘Great Bear,’ etc. are always visible in England during their whole twenty-four hours' revolution. Those further away southwards rise north-north-east, and set south-south-west; still further south they rise east by north, and set west by north. The farthest south visible from England, the rising is more to the east and south-east, and the setting to the west and south-west. But all the stars visible from London rise and set in a way which is not compatible with the doctrine of rotundity. For instance, if we stand with our backs to the north, on the high land known as ‘Arthur's Seat,’ near Edinburgh, and note the stars in the zenith of our position, and watch for several hours, the zenith stars will gradually recede to the north-west. If we do the same on Woodhouse Moor, near Leeds, or on any of the mountain tops in Yorkshire or Derbyshire, the same phenomenon is observed. The same thing may be seen from the top of Primrose Hill, near Regent's Park, London; from Hampstead Heath; or Shooter's Hill, near Woolwich. If we remain all night, we shall observe the same stars rising towards our position from the north-east, showing that the path of all the stars between ourselves and the northern centre move round the north pole-star as a common centre of rotation; just as they must do over a plane such as the earth is proved to be. It is undeniable that upon a globe zenith stars would rise, pass over head, and set in the plane of the observer's position. If now we carefully watch in the same way the zenith stars from the Rock of Gibraltar, the very same phenomenon is observed. The same is also the case from Cape of Good Hope, Sydney and Melbourne in Australia, in New Zealand, in Rio Janeiro, Monte Video, Valparaiso, and other places in the south. If then the zenith stars of all the places on the earth, where special observations have been made, rise from the morning horizon to the zenith of an observer, and descend to the evening horizon, not in a plane of the position of such observer, but in an arc of a circle concentric with the northern centre, the earth is thereby proved to be a plane, and rotundity altogether disproved - shown, indeed, to be impossible.”
-Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (284-6)
Debunking star distances using physics
When dealing with stars they are measured in solar radius: 1 R☉ = 432,288 miles. 1 Lightyear = 5,880,000,000,000 miles. All these can be found at thoughtco.com Ten closest stars. [4]
Inverse-square law says: The divergence of a vector field which is the resultant of radial Inverse-square law fields with respect to one or more sources is proportional to the strength of the local sources, and hence zero outside sources. Isaac Newton's law of universal gravitation follows an Inverse-square law, as do the effects of electric, light, sound, and radiation phenomena... Doubling the distance reduces illumination to 1/4 intensity.
By considering these laws of physics alone(each one separately debunks the whole paradigm) they utterly destroy the mainstream figures but together they make the impossibility of it astronomical. There is no possible way anything of these sizes could be visible at those distances and there is no possible way light could propagate across those distances either. To believe that both of these laws are broken and you see stars hundreds or thousands of light years, or even 30 light hours away is ludicrous.
The stars orbit around the north pole and are all similar distances in elevation, I think less than 3000 miles but could be much less like 100 to 200 miles high. Actually I'm just guessing about this, but it makes more sense than the official narrative.
Barnards Star
- Radius of Barnards star = 84,728 miles * 2 = Diameter of 169,456.896
- Distance from Earth = 5.96 ly in miles = 35,044,800,000,000 or 35.0448 trillion
- Angular size in degrees 0.00000027705009528861455
Barnards star should be 60,157 times smaller than the smallest resolvable size but the Wikipedia says it is visible by the naked eye.
I think good telescopes can magnify 200 – 300 times. Even if 1000 times can be achieved, it is far from 60,158 times, which is impossible. Barnards star is the next closest star aside from Alpha Centauri, which is a group of three stars and makes it more complicated to analyze here.
Wolf 359
- Radius of 0.144
- diameter in miles is 124,498.944
- Distance of 7.78 Light years or in miles is 4.57464×10¹² or 45,746,400,000,000
- Angular size in degrees = 1.559306047219555e-7 or 0.0000001559306047219555
This means Wolf 359 would have an apparent size 106,885 times smaller than the smallest visible object.
Lalande 21185
- Lalande 21185 has a solar radius of 0.392 which makes its diameter in miles 338,913.79
- Distance of 8.29 LY or in miles it’s 4.87452×10¹³ = 48,745,200,000,000
- Angular size in degrees = 3.9836393708063734e-7 or 0.00000039836393708063734
This one is 41,837 times smaller than the smallest visible size. By multiplying this number by the size, we get the size that would make it visible which is a diameter of 14,179,404,192.64 miles. They claim you need a telescope to see it so it would have to be around 14 trillion miles wide to be visible by telescope.
Epsilon Eridani
- Solar radius of 0.375
- diameter in miles 324,216
- Distance is 10.52 LY or 6.18576×10¹³ miles or 61,857,600,000,000;
- Angular size in degrees = 3.003060004043723e-7 or 0.0000003003060004043723
The angular size of Epsilon Eridani should be 55,498 times smaller than the smallest resolvable size with the naked eye but thoughtco.com says it is visible with the naked eye. It would have to have a minimum diameter of 17,993,646,816 miles to become barely visible. If we count the solar system as ending at Neptune, then it would have a radius of 4.545 billion km and a diameter of 9.09 billion which works out to 5,648,264,117 miles. This means we should be able to easily fit 3 of our solar systems side by side inside of this star to make it visible.
V762 Cassiopeiae
- Diameter of 166,679,600.53 miles
- Distance 2764.1 LY= 1.6252908×10¹⁶ = 16,252,908,000,000,000 or 16.252908 quadrillion miles
- Angular diameter is 5.87589472683628e-7 or 0.000000587589472683628
V762 Cassiopeiae should be 28,364.475156235 times smaller than the smallest visible size. To actually be visible with the naked eye it would have to be 4.727779388×10¹² or 4,727,779,388,000 miles wide. That’s nearly 5 quadrillion miles.
Gallery
-
This is a Real Star
-
1000s of years, Sailors used same stars because they never moved
-
Sirus - image by Mikey Smith
