Pseudoscience/Scientific theory
Scientific theory
Science is defined as a system of knowledge, a branch of study, or a method of inquiry. However "Scientific Theory" can mean so much more and so much less at the same time. Let's take apart some wikipedia articles defining "Scientific Theory" and see what loopholes exist in the religion of Scientism brought to us by the Jesuit priests (The "giants" that modern day scientists state that they're standing on the shoulders of).
1. "A scientific theory differs from a scientific fact or scientific law in that a theory explains "why" or "how": a fact is a simple, basic observation; whereas a law is a statement (often a mathematical equation) about a relationship between facts and/or other laws."
Take note of the "often a mathematical equation" part of the last statement. You must understand the "GIGO" rule, which is "Garbage In, Garbage Out". Mathematical equations can be complete garbage if assumptions or misinterpretations are variables, which unfortunately this is true in many cases in modern science.
2. "Facts and theories are different things: 'Facts' are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret the 'facts'."
Keep in mind the "world's data" could be misinterpreted, and the Theory to explain this misinterpreted data would be worthless.
3. "In everyday speech, theory can imply an explanation that represents an unsubstantiated and speculative guess, whereas in a scientific context it most often refers to an explanation that has already been tested and is widely accepted as valid."
Note the use of the word "theory" and "accepted as valid" in the same sentence, and consider what "accepting as valid" could mean when you're in an institution that discourages alternate possibilities that go against the customs of modern science. More examples of this to come.
4. "Newton's Law of Gravity is a mathematical equation that can be used to predict the attraction between bodies, but it is not a theory to explain how gravity works"
Granted, you could use a stop watch to time how fast things fall under different situations, and come up with math that could be used to describe your timings. The other point here is the statement "it is not theory to explain how gravity works" is why globe supporters find it difficult to understand flat-earthers claim that gravity is fake. Because we have math that was formulated based on the rate things fall - and later called "law"; and they really have no theory to back what gravity actually is.
5. "As additional scientific evidence is gathered, a scientific theory may be modified and ultimately rejected if it cannot be made to fit the new findings; in such circumstances, a more accurate theory is then required."
As additional scientific evidence is gathered means, a theory could have been made without all the evidence gathered.
6. "Some theories are so well-established that they are unlikely ever to be fundamentally changed (for example, scientific theories such as evolution, heliocentric theory, cell theory, theory of plate tectonics, germ theory of disease, etc.). In certain cases, a scientific theory or scientific law that fails to fit all data can still be useful (due to its simplicity) as an approximation under specific conditions. An example is Newton's laws of motion, which are a highly accurate approximation to special relativity at velocities that are small relative to the speed of light."
So some theories are unlikely to ever be fundamentally changed.
Notice the debunked "evolution theory" and "heliocentric theory" is in this list?
- Did you know our movement in the claimed "orbit" around the sun has NEVER been measured?
- Did you know Einstein even stated "no optical experiment can be done to prove Earth's motion"?
- Did you know Edwin Hubble stated that a unique position in the universe cannot be disproved but it is unwelcome?
- Did you know Edwin Hubble felt that a favored location must be avoided at all costs.... Such a favored position is intolerable and a horror?
7. Scientific theories are testable and make verifiable predictions. They describe the causes of a particular natural phenomenon and are used to explain and predict aspects of the physical universe or specific areas of inquiry (for example, electricity, chemistry, and astronomy). As with other forms of scientific knowledge, scientific theories are both deductive and inductive, aiming for predictive and explanatory power.
Scientific theories that are testable and verifiable is what we support yet our heliocentric universe model comes from assumptions that cannot be verified. Questioning these theories are often seen as taboo subjects to question, maybe because of the "intolerable horror of a favored position". Maybe this is why the CMB (Cosmic microwave background) studies that were performed keep showing that earth is in the center of all creation, and why they label this phenomenon as the axis of evil?